[Automated] Update aws CLI Options

[thomhurst]

Summary

This PR contains automatically generated updates to aws CLI options classes.

The generator scraped the latest CLI help output from the installed tool.

Changes

• Updated options classes to reflect latest CLI documentation
• Added new commands if any were detected
• Updated option types and descriptions

Command coverage

Command coverage report:

• aws (aws-cli/2.36.46 Python/3.14.6 Linux/6.17.0-1022-azure exe/x86_64.ubuntu.24): 19332 commands, tree f93794b2c00ae699042c1352ec8a5b09781ff6601808106f970f1bb1890110bc
  • Baseline comparison: 18920 commands at aws-cli/2.36.34 Python/3.14.6 Linux/6.17.0-1022-azure exe/x86_64.ubuntu.24 -> 19332 commands at aws-cli/2.36.46 Python/3.14.6 Linux/6.17.0-1022-azure exe/x86_64.ubuntu.24
  • Added: aws accessanalyzer create-analyzer, aws accessanalyzer create-service-linked-analyzer, aws accessanalyzer update-analyzer, aws acm list-certificates, aws agent-registry-control create-registry, aws agent-registry-control update-registry, aws aiops create-investigation-group, aws aiops update-investigation-group, aws appconfig update-experiment-definition, aws appconfig update-extension, aws appflow list-connector-entities, aws appflow reset-connector-metadata-cache, aws application-signals create-service-level-objective, aws application-signals update-service-level-objective, aws apprunner update-service, aws appstream create-fleet, aws appstream create-image-builder, aws appstream update-app-block-builder, aws appstream update-fleet, aws autoscaling create-auto-scaling-group, aws autoscaling put-scaling-policy, aws autoscaling start-instance-refresh, aws autoscaling update-auto-scaling-group, aws b2bi create-transformer, aws b2bi update-transformer, aws backupsearch start-search-job, aws batch cancel-jobs, aws batch create-scheduling-policy, aws batch register-job-definition, aws batch submit-job, aws batch submit-service-job, aws batch terminate-jobs, aws batch terminate-service-jobs, aws batch update-scheduling-policy, aws bedrock create-model-customization-job, aws bedrock create-model-import-job, aws bedrock create-model-invocation-job, aws bedrock-agent create-flow, aws bedrock-agent update-flow, aws bedrock-agent-runtime retrieve, aws bedrock-agent-runtime retrieve-and-generate, aws bedrock-agentcore start-browser-session, aws bedrock-agentcore-control create-agent-runtime, aws bedrock-agentcore-control create-consent-portal, aws bedrock-agentcore-control create-gateway, aws bedrock-agentcore-control create-harness, aws bedrock-agentcore-control create-payment-manager, aws bedrock-agentcore-control create-registry, aws bedrock-agentcore-control delete-consent-portal, aws bedrock-agentcore-control get-consent-portal (+362 more; see manifest)

Verification

• Solution builds successfully

---

🤖 Generated with ModularPipelines.OptionsGenerator

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-16T10:54:27.148969Z	0138629	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

CodeRabbit couldn't post its review summary.

Error details

Validation Failed: {"resource":"IssueComment","code":"unprocessable","field":"data","message":"Body is too long (maximum is 65536 characters)"} - https://docs.github.com/rest/issues/comments#create-an-issue-comment

[thomhurst]

Replacement for #5168 (and the superseded #5163, #5157, #5155, and #5148), regenerated from main f408d8c in run 35076388294.

Audit of 0138629:

• AWS CLI 2.36.46: 19,332 commands versus 18,920 on main; 412 additions, zero removals.
• Compared with [Automated] Update aws CLI Options #5168, the only output changes are 51 removed SecretValue attributes (31 numeric metadata fields and 20 public enum choices), unused secret imports, and the provenance hash. No numeric or enum option retains inferred SecretValue masking. Password and WebIdentityToken remain masked.
• Prior SNS/VPN/ACM enum, required boolean, collection, and operand fixes are unchanged from the reviewed snapshot.
• Generation solution build passed with zero errors; two existing core RS0026 warnings. Documentation CI passed; the docs tree is unchanged from the previously locally validated generated snapshot.
• No generator inputs or generated-package API baselines changed in this PR.

Waiting for integration CI and completed reviews before merge. #5173 remains held until this AWS output is handled, preserving the generation fingerprint.

[thomhurst]

@coderabbitai review Please keep the summary short enough for the GitHub comment limit. The manual audit is in the preceding comment; report actionable findings separately.

[coderabbitai]

@thomhurst I will review this PR. I will keep the summary concise and report actionable findings separately.

⚠️ Action not completed

Already reviewed the last commit. Use @coderabbitai full review to rerun a review of the entire changeset.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[thomhurst]

@coderabbitai full review Please keep the summary below the GitHub comment limit and report any actionable findings separately.

[coderabbitai]

@thomhurst I will perform a full review. I will keep the summary below the GitHub comment limit. I will report actionable findings separately.

⚠️ Action not completed

No files to review.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

CodeRabbit couldn't post its review summary.

Error details

Validation Failed: {"resource":"IssueComment","code":"unprocessable","field":"data","message":"Body is too long (maximum is 65536 characters)"} - https://docs.github.com/rest/issues/comments#create-an-issue-comment

[thomhurst]

Final review audit: Codex completed review of 0138629 without findings; Claude review and all CI checks passed. No inline findings or unresolved threads remain. CodeRabbit could not publish its summary because of the GitHub comment-size limit; one full-review retry returned no files and the same posting error. The independent output audit above verifies command coverage, enum boundaries, and secret metadata.