Repository navigation
Docs: current state, no em dashes, restyled site - #81
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>
…e inline code, one code surface, softer row dividers) Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <[email protected]>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Checks
Links, SRS trace, metrics and the documentation tests pass; the strict docs build passes. No code changed. I checked the rendered home and a table page in light and dark in a headless browser.
Not done
The audit skill also lists typography, motion and layout upgrades meant for marketing sites; none was applied to a reference site. The two other design resources named in the request (awesome-design.md and impeccable) are not installed here, so they were not used.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code