Skip to content

feat(r2): add the Robbyant R2 real-robot extension - #326

Closed
andylin-hao wants to merge 1 commit into
RLinf:mainfrom
andylin-hao:feat/r2-robot
Closed

andylin-hao wants to merge 1 commit into
RLinf:mainfrom
andylin-hao:feat/r2-robot

Conversation

@andylin-hao

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Let an LLM planner operate an R2 without a VLA. An env server on the robot runs RLinf's R2Env and checks every planner command against a site config (per-arm workspace box, per-call distance and rotation, joint speed) before the robot moves.

The planner gets Cartesian arm moves, grippers, the head, an opt-in chassis, state views, and back_project, which turns pixels into base_link points from depth, configured intrinsics and distortion, and camera poses computed from the robot's URDF and measured joints.

Add robots.r2.diagnostics for a no-motion server check, offline tests including an HTTP loopback through the real facade and client, and English and Chinese deployment docs. R2 support in RLinf is in RLinf/RLinf#1745.

Description

Testing

Manual verification

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • I have updated related documentation when needed.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes when needed.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

Let an LLM planner operate an R2 without a VLA. An env server on the
robot runs RLinf's R2Env and checks every planner command against a
site config (per-arm workspace box, per-call distance and rotation,
joint speed) before the robot moves.

The planner gets Cartesian arm moves, grippers, the head, an opt-in
chassis, state views, and back_project, which turns pixels into
base_link points from depth, configured intrinsics and distortion, and
camera poses computed from the robot's URDF and measured joints.

Add robots.r2.diagnostics for a no-motion server check, offline tests
including an HTTP loopback through the real facade and client, and
English and Chinese deployment docs. R2 support in RLinf is in
RLinf/RLinf#1745.

Signed-off-by: Hao Lin <[email protected]>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 30, 2026 11:18

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.

An organization owner can choose the repository organization as the billing source for reviews requested by members with a paid Copilot license. Learn about Copilot code review billing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants