π¨ Palette: μ 보 λ·°μ΄μ λΉνμ±νλ λ²νΌμ λν μ κ·Όμ± λ° ν΄ν κ°μ - #829
π¨ Palette: μ
보 λ·°μ΄μ λΉνμ±νλ λ²νΌμ λν μ κ·Όμ± λ° ν΄ν κ°μ #829seonghobae wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
|
π Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a π emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
π WalkthroughWalkthrough
Changesμ μ λ·°μ΄ νμ΄μ§ κ²½κ³ μ²λ¦¬
PDF.js μμ‘΄μ± λ° μ·¨μ½μ μ€μ
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
π₯ Pre-merge checks | β 5β Passed checks (5 passed)
β¨ Finishing Touchesπ§ͺ Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
π§Ή Nitpick comments (1)
apps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreViewer.test.tsx (1)
179-194: π― Functional Correctness | π΅ Trivial | β‘ Quick win
titleν΄ν μ°κ²°μ ν μ€νΈμ ν¬ν¨ν΄ μ£ΌμΈμ.νμ¬ ν μ€νΈλ
aria-disabledμpreventDefault()λ§ νμΈν©λλ€.scoreViewerPrevPageDisabledλλscoreViewerNextPageDisabledκ°titleμ μ°κ²°λμ§ μμλ ν μ€νΈκ° ν΅κ³Όν©λλ€. 첫 νμ΄μ§μ λ§μ§λ§ νμ΄μ§μ λΉνμ± μ λͺ©κ³Ό μ€κ° νμ΄μ§μ μΌλ° μ λͺ©μ νμΈν΄ μ£ΌμΈμ.ν μ€νΈ λ³΄κ° μμ
expect(previousButton).toHaveAttribute("aria-disabled", "true"); + expect(previousButton).toHaveAttribute("title", "Previous page (Unavailable)"); fireEvent.click(nextButton); expect(screen.getByText("Page 2 of 3")).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(nextButton).toHaveAttribute("title", "Next page"); fireEvent.click(nextButton); expect(screen.getByText("Page 3 of 3")).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(nextButton).toHaveAttribute("aria-disabled", "true"); + expect(nextButton).toHaveAttribute("title", "Next page (Unavailable)");π€ Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@apps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreViewer.test.tsx` around lines 179 - 194, Extend the ScoreViewer pagination test to assert the button title attributes: verify the previous button has the disabled-page title on the first page, both buttons have their normal titles on the middle page, and the next button has the disabled-page title on the final page. Keep the existing aria-disabled and preventDefault assertions unchanged.
π€ Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@apps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreViewer.test.tsx`:
- Around line 179-194: Extend the ScoreViewer pagination test to assert the
button title attributes: verify the previous button has the disabled-page title
on the first page, both buttons have their normal titles on the middle page, and
the next button has the disabled-page title on the final page. Keep the existing
aria-disabled and preventDefault assertions unchanged.
βΉοΈ Review info
βοΈ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: a6f070d0-902c-4aa6-b3e6-8096589bd958
π Files selected for processing (4)
apps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreViewer.test.tsxapps/desktop/src/features/score/ScoreViewer.tsxapps/desktop/src/locales/en/common.jsonapps/desktop/src/locales/ko/common.json
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
π€ Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.jules/sentinel.md:
- Around line 32-35: Update the vulnerability record in the sentinel
documentation so CVE-2026-16633 is attributed to pdfjs-dist, alongside
GHSA-hq66-cqwq-w95j, and state that pdfjs-dist 6.2.108 is the fixed version. If
Trivy reports a separate undici vulnerability, record its distinct advisory ID
separately rather than associating it with CVE-2026-16633.
In @.trivyignore:
- Around line 30-31: Remove the CVE-2026-16633 and GHSA-hq66-cqwq-w95j entries
from .trivyignore if the current trivy-fs-scan no longer reports them with
pdfjs-dist 6.2.108. If either exception remains necessary, retain it only with
documented justification and an expiration date in the existing exp:YYYY-MM-DD
format.
πͺ Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
βΉοΈ Review info
βοΈ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 96699da9-c8c7-48d4-821c-22062bb32a63
β Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
π Files selected for processing (4)
.jules/sentinel.md.trivyignoreapps/desktop/package.jsonpackage.json
![opencode-agent[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1549082?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
OpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass.
Review outcome
1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
-
Problem: The required coverage-evidence job result was
failure, so OpenCode cannot establish approval sufficiency for this head. -
Root cause: Automated approval is only valid when the same-head coverage-evidence job proves supported repository test suites passed and configured docstring gates passed or were advisory, or reports not applicable because no supported source files or package manifests exist. Missing, failed, skipped, unavailable, or unsupported-tooling test evidence is a blocker.
-
Fix: Install or configure the repository test/docstring evidence tooling when source files or package manifests exist, rerun the current-head coverage-evidence job, and approve only after it reports
successwith required evidence or explicit no-source not-applicable evidence. -
Regression test: Keep the approval branch checking
needs.coverage-evidence.result == successbefore posting APPROVE, and publish REQUEST_CHANGES when coverage-evidence blocker states such as cancelled, skipped, failed, unsupported-tooling, or below-100 evidence are present. -
Result: REQUEST_CHANGES
-
Reason: coverage-evidence result was
failure, so required test/docstring evidence was not proven for current head368a12fadd3c4bbba8a2e190425b66af82007193. -
Head SHA:
368a12fadd3c4bbba8a2e190425b66af82007193 -
Workflow run: 31650145137
-
Workflow attempt: 1
Coverage evidence
Coverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence.
Changed-File Evidence Map
flowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (7 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (7 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
OpenCode Review Overview
Pull request overviewOpenCode cannot approve yet because required coverage evidence did not pass. Review outcome1. HIGH .github/workflows/opencode-review.yml:1 - Coverage evidence did not prove required test/docstring evidence
Coverage evidenceCoverage evidence job did not run or did not publish coverage evidence. Changed-File Evidence Mapflowchart LR
PR["PR changed files"] --> Evidence["OpenCode bounded evidence"]
Evidence --> S1["Changed file (7 files)"]
S1 --> I1["repository behavior"]
I1 --> R1["Review risk: Changed file (7 files)"]
R1 --> V1["required checks"]
|
|
Closing as superseded by #731. The canonical PR retains this branch's localized unavailable-page hints, adds score-list and all viewer control tooltips, keeps unavailable controls focusable with guarded activation and visible requirement association, and carries stronger direct regression evidence. #731 was rebuilt from protected |
Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task. |
1 participant
π‘ What: μ 보 λ·°μ΄μ 'μ΄μ νμ΄μ§' λ° 'λ€μ νμ΄μ§' λ²νΌμμ HTML disabled μμ±μ aria-disabled="true"λ‘ κ΅μ²΄νκ³ , λΉνμ±νλ μνμ λν ν΄νμ μΆκ°νμ΅λλ€.
π― Why: HTML disabled μμ±μ μ€ν¬λ¦° 리λμμ μμλ₯Ό μμ ν μ¨κΈ°κ³ λͺ¨λ ν¬μΈν° μ΄λ²€νΈλ₯Ό μ°¨λ¨νμ¬ ν΄νμ΄ νμλμ§ μκ² ν©λλ€. μ΄λ₯Ό λ³κ²½ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ μκ° μ₯μ μΈ λ° λ§μ°μ€ μ¬μ©μ λͺ¨λμκ² ν΄ν μ κ·Όμ±κ³Ό ν€λ³΄λ ν¬μ»€μ€ μ§μμ μ μ§ν©λλ€.
βΏ Accessibility: λΉνμ±νλ νμ΄μ§ λ²νΌμ aria-disabledμ μ λͺ© μμ±μ ν΅ν΄ ν΄ν μ κ·Όμ± λ° ν€λ³΄λ λ€λΉκ²μ΄μ μ 볡μνμ΅λλ€.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 12042901864592730467 started by @seonghobae
Summary by CodeRabbit
κ°μ μ¬ν
ν μ€νΈ