Automate pnpm updates - #70
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Team Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (9)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds scheduled and reusable GitHub Actions workflows that update pnpm with Corepack and create or refresh a pull request through Release Branchkeeper. Adds documentation, release metadata, and tests for workflow structure and branch behavior. Changespnpm update automation
Estimated code review effort: 4 (Complex) | ~45 minutes Merge Risk: 🟡 Moderate · up to This PR automates weekly pnpm updates, but content produced by the downloaded latest pnpm release can currently change any part of package.json before the workflow commits it to the update branch and opens a pull request. Because the workflow does not verify that only the intended pnpm version changed, this bounded supply-chain risk needs to be fixed or explicitly accepted before merging. Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant ScheduledCaller as repo-pnpm-update.yml
participant SharedWorkflow as shared-pnpm-update.yml
participant Corepack
participant Branchkeeper as Release Branchkeeper GitHub App
ScheduledCaller->>SharedWorkflow: Invoke weekly workflow
SharedWorkflow->>Corepack: Run corepack use pnpm@latest
SharedWorkflow->>SharedWorkflow: Validate package.json-only diff
SharedWorkflow->>Branchkeeper: Create token and update automation/pnpm-update
Branchkeeper->>Branchkeeper: Commit package.json
Branchkeeper->>Branchkeeper: Create or refresh pull request
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 4 files. (5 skipped: 5 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
| Project | zemd |
| Branch | zemd/automate-pnpm-updates |
| Testbed | ubuntu-latest |
⚠️ WARNING: No Threshold found!Without a Threshold, no Alerts will ever be generated.
Click here to create a new Threshold
For more information, see the Threshold documentation.
To only post results if a Threshold exists, set the--ci-only-thresholdsflag.
Click to view all benchmark results
| Benchmark | Latency | nanoseconds (ns) | Throughput | operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @zemd/color/oklch_to_srgb | 📈 view plot | 112.01 ns | 📈 view plot | 8,927.84 ops/s x 1e3 |
| @zemd/color/srgb_to_oklch | 📈 view plot | 178.24 ns | 📈 view plot | 5,610.36 ops/s x 1e3 |
| @zemd/nestjs-pino-logger/build structured message | 📈 view plot | 162.73 ns | 📈 view plot | 6,144.99 ops/s x 1e3 |
| @zemd/nestjs-pino-logger/format cached-context log | 📈 view plot | 1,008.30 ns | 📈 view plot | 991.76 ops/s x 1e3 |
| @zemd/std-modules/merge nested objects | 📈 view plot | 17,038.05 ns | 📈 view plot | 58.69 ops/s x 1e3 |
| @zemd/std-modules/merge shallow objects | 📈 view plot | 6,909.46 ns | 📈 view plot | 144.73 ops/s x 1e3 |
No description provided.