Repository navigation
docs: present as a standalone project, drop client name and assessment framing - #21
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…e project Removes every mention of the originating client's name and reframes the docs so the project reads as a standalone service rather than a graded submission: "assessment deliverable"/"assessment code"/"assessment workbook" become neutral descriptions, "submission scope"/"presentation scope" become "core scope"/"extended scope", QA_PREP.md's "Twenty Questions They Will Ask" becomes a design-rationale FAQ, and CONTRIBUTING.md's intro no longer frames the repo as an assessment submission. No code, tests, or application behavior changed -- doc wording and framing only. Also removes the now-unused backend/app/collections/images/ placeholder: real screenshots already live in docs/images/ and are wired into the root README, so the placeholder was dead weight pointing at an empty folder nobody was going to use.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this adds
A documentation-only pass across every
.mdfile in the repo that:"assessment workbook" framing in favor of neutral project language.
submission scope/presentation scopephase-statustaxonomy (used in status lines across README/ARCHITECTURE/DEVELOPMENT/
CHANGELOG) to
core scope/extended scope.QA_PREP.md's "Twenty Questions They Will Ask" as adesign-rationale FAQ, and drops the "graded on" / deadline-driven
framing from
MASTER_PLAN.md's scope section in favor of neutralmilestone language.
CONTRIBUTING.md's intro so it no longer frames the repo asan assessment submission.
backend/app/collections/images/placeholderfolder — real screenshots already live in
docs/images/and are wiredinto the root README, so the placeholder pointed at an empty folder
nobody was going to use.
Requirement served
None — this is a documentation cleanup pass, not a phase feature. No
code, tests, business logic, or application behavior changed; every
edit is wording/framing in
.mdfiles.Docs updated
backend/app/collections/README.md).github/pull_request_template.md,postman/README.mdVerification
Returns no matches anywhere in the repo's own docs (only an unrelated
third-party package under
.venv/still contains the substring"assess", which is untouched, vendored code).
Known gaps carried to next phase
None — this PR is self-contained.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 [email protected]
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014n7w1328Fh3n15C71ywoZA
Generated by Claude Code