Skip to content

complete bambu-op parity for operator cutover - #6

Merged
voska merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/VOS-949-operator-parity
Oct 9, 2026
Merged

voska merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/VOS-949-operator-parity

Conversation

@voska

@voska voska commented Oct 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

This completes the operator workflow in bambu so its charter and skill can switch without losing functionality.

  • Port verified chamber-light control and temporary lighting for camera/monitor snapshots, built-in ntfy configuration/token/attachment handling, continuous monitoring and cadence flags, STEP tessellation, object footprints and suggested-slot metadata.
  • Add opt-in strict operator gates and preview requirements while preserving existing Go defaults and output contracts. Add full monitor final state and keep outcome codes correct in continuous mode.
  • Verify pause/stop state before success. Reject stale slice output and unexpected tool changes; preserve light restoration on failures and interruption.
  • Document the command, configuration and secret-store migration.

Validation: make ci (format, lint: 0 issues, vet, race tests, build); independent review approved after regression tests for missing MQTT ACKs, monitor outcomes/interruption and first-plate footprints. Real Bambu Studio 02.08.02.61 sliced a STEP coupon with a preview and dimensions. Read-only strict two-colour dry run on X1C passed with [3, 0] AMS mapping. A real camera capture verified light off → on → off; status independently confirmed restoration. No print, motion or filament change was sent. Notification lifecycle/failures and attachments are tested against local HTTP fixtures; ntfy is unconfigured locally.

@voska
voska merged commit e604550 into main Oct 9, 2026
4 checks passed
@voska voska changed the title VOS-949: complete bambu-op parity for Print Operator cutover complete bambu-op parity for operator cutover Oct 10, 2026
@voska
voska deleted the feat/VOS-949-operator-parity branch October 10, 2026 19:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant