Skip to content

docs: canonical Caspar LED vs PGM output topology - #30

Open
kubo6472 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/output-topology-doc-fdc0
Open

docs: canonical Caspar LED vs PGM output topology#30
kubo6472 wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
cursor/output-topology-doc-fdc0

Conversation

@kubo6472

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Why

LED vs PGM routing was scattered and contradictory (e.g. catalogue “CH1 PGM” / “CH2 LED”, intro handoff putting Presenter MOD on LED). Operators can’t see L3Ds on the LED wall by design — need one committed map.

What

  • Add docs/integration/OUTPUT_TOPOLOGY.md: allow-list, layer tables, RE piece cheat sheet, “why L3D missing” checklist, taxonomy disentangle.
  • Point AGENTS.md, SPRAVY, DOUBLEBOX, and blueprints handoffs at it; fix inverted channel notes.

Note on L3D visibility

gfx/l3d-* → Caspar ch2 layer 121 only. Watching both consumers and still blank usually means templates/deploy or pending blueprints GFX-output fix (#61 companion), not LED routing. This PR is docs-only.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Add OUTPUT_TOPOLOGY.md as the single map of which RE/Sofie sources land on
Caspar ch1 (LED allow-list) vs ch2 (PGM). Point AGENTS and integration docs at
it; fix inverted CH1/CH2 catalogue notes and the handoff that put l3d-mod on LED.

Co-authored-by: Jakub Doboš <[email protected]>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@kubo6472, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 115 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4c76360b-225a-4637-95c5-ac48a2ae3b30

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ae6de3 and a2fe123.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • AGENTS.md
  • docs/integration/DOUBLEBOX-PGM.md
  • docs/integration/OUTPUT_TOPOLOGY.md
  • docs/integration/SPRAVY-V2-INTEGRATION.md
  • docs/integration/handoffs/blueprints-intro-pgm-layer.md
  • docs/integration/handoffs/blueprints-v2-wiring.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@kubo6472
kubo6472 marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2026 19:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants