feat(api): add plan-to-execution support diagnostics - #927
Draft
frahlg wants to merge 25 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Ahlgren <[email protected]>
frahlg
force-pushed
the
agent/release-command-outcome-safety
branch
4 times, most recently
from
August 16, 2026 19:53
3308127 to
ab2d9ad
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
A v1.15 support bundle from a passive-arbitrage site showed a live target of +33.659 W, but it could not prove which accepted plan or forecast inputs reached control. It also exposed raw host, location, network, and device identifiers.
The small target itself matches the existing remaining-energy calculation: a 100 Wh slot had already met its budget, the battery drifted by about -26 W, and 64.08 seconds remained. That explains the target shape, but it does not prove that the accepted plan was correct.
What changed
plan-execution.jsonto the help bundle.Limits
Driver command result v1 does not carry a plan decision ID. The bundle says that this join is unavailable; it does not infer causation from timestamps.
This PR does not close #885, #766, or #822.
Stack and merge order
This draft is stacked on #926 and #922 so its diff contains only support diagnostics. Do not merge it before those PRs. #769 keeps its feature work and must rebase after the agreed safety/support order; #887 and #888 follow #769.
Checks
make verifyon the reviewed stack: 167 optimizer tests, all Go packages, external optimizer checks, Compose migration, boundaries, vet, and build