Skip to content

chore: update codeowners [PRODSEC-10215] - #154

Closed
bikochan wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
update-ownership-PRODSEC-10215-tf62
Closed

bikochan wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
update-ownership-PRODSEC-10215-tf62

Conversation

@bikochan

@bikochan bikochan commented Sep 21, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updates codeowners to append the new github governance managed teams.
For more information, please check:

[!IMPORTANT]:
If this service relies on vervet, you will need to run a command to regenerate the spec (e.g. 'make generate') before merging it.
The best option is to:

  • checkout the branch 'update-ownership-PRODSEC-10215-tf62'
  • run the command
  • commit and push the results to this PR before you approve and merge it.

Note

Low Risk
CODEOWNERS-only change with no runtime, security, or data-handling impact.

Overview
Adds @robguinness-snyk as a default code owner alongside @snyk/engines_sca-scanners for all paths (*), aligning repository ownership with updated GitHub governance teams (PRODSEC-10215).

No application or infrastructure code is modified.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit d9b5e82. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@snyk-io

snyk-io Bot commented Sep 21, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
✅ Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
✅ Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
✅ Code Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@snyk-pr-review-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ No major issues detected

@nico-incubiq

Copy link
Copy Markdown

We do not want to add individuals to codeowners

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants