Repository navigation
Previous commit did not properly update zlib. - #284
Conversation
…ch fixes CVE-2026-76844 Signed-off-by: Loganaden Velvindron <[email protected]>
|
Something went wrong, and I think it was on my side. Meantime the release was automated, so let's try this then. Yes, the published crate is missing the entire zlib update. This branch restores exactly the revision the same author submitted earlier. Version | Bundled zlib revision -- | -- Author’s earlier PR #281 | 99623ef — zlib 1.4 Published libz-sys 1.1.32 | da607da — zlib 1.3.2 This branch | 99623ef — zlib 1.4The cause is release commit That omission is material. The 1.4 changelog includes a The new commit’s mention of another CVE adds no new upstream code compared with the earlier PR: both select the exact same commit. A corrective release would need a new crate version; this branch still says No builds or tests run; this was a history and published-source comparison. These fixes apply when using bundled stock zlib; system zlib and zlib-ng depend on their own versions. **Yes, the published crate is missing the entire zlib update.** This branch restores exactly the revision the same author submitted earlier.
The cause is release commit That omission is material. The [1.4 changelog](https://github.com/madler/zlib/blob/99623ef7097352da7993ba614161fd6a311e046e/ChangeLog) includes a The new commit’s mention of another CVE adds no new upstream code compared with the earlier PR: both select the exact same commit. A corrective release would need a new crate version; this branch still says No builds or tests run; this was a history and published-source comparison. These fixes apply when using bundled stock zlib; system zlib and zlib-ng depend on their own versions. |
Update to zlib v1.4 which fixes CVE-2026-85091.