Repository navigation
fix(magnets): keep elongated five-pocket layouts in a cross - #102
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Deploying with
|
| Status | Name | Latest Commit | Preview URL | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ Deployment successful! View logs |
basekit | 1b9f577 | Commit Preview URL Branch Preview URL |
Oct 13 2026, 06:45 PM |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
Saved five-pocket cross layouts put all five magnets in a row on elongated bases, including a 170×109mm oval.
Changes
I kept the outer pockets on the four cardinal axes using the existing cross radius. Matching holder pockets use the same layout, and balanced arrangements keep their existing behavior.
Risk
Low. Legacy elongated cross layouts move their pockets, so previously printed bases and holders need matching replacements. Revert this commit to restore the previous positions.
Verification
I ran
just check(504 tests) and the browser suite (71 tests). I reopened the reported share link locally and inspected the corrected cross. I exported that exact setup to STL and checked every welded edge for closure and consistent winding.Checklist