Draft
Fix build and test image job by correcting external checkout target in ISO workflow#1
build and test image job by correcting external checkout target in ISO workflow#1Conversation
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Fix failing GitHub Actions job 'build and test image'
Fix Aug 10, 2026
build and test image job by correcting external checkout target in ISO workflow
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
build and test imagejob was failing in Actions due to an invalid/mis-scoped checkout target in the ISO pipeline. This change updates the workflow to checkout the correct repository source so the image build stage can run end-to-end instead of failing during setup.Root cause
radix-gnu-linux/radixin the build job, which caused setup failure in the failing run (93615082902).Workflow fix
.github/workflows/build-iso.ymlto use the correct repository reference for this pipeline context.Why this is minimal