Corrections to satisfy Codacy complaints

[danolivo]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 02509fff-aff4-4c26-844f-6f6ef23e5627

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d964e39 and 01c892f.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• src/lolor_fsstubs.c
• src/lolor_inv_api.c
• tests/junit/multinode/src/test/java/com/pgedge/lolor/Utility.java
• tests/junit/singlenode/src/test/java/com/pgedge/lolor/Utility.java

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes add Semgrep suppression annotations to large-object memcpy calls and test SQL preparation statements. Existing export formatting around transient file handling was adjusted without changing control flow or error handling.

Changes

Lint cleanup

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Runtime large-object annotations src/lolor_inv_api.c, src/lolor_fsstubs.c	Large-object read, write, truncate, and export code adds targeted annotations or formatting updates while preserving existing behavior.
Test SQL annotations tests/junit/*/src/test/java/com/pgedge/lolor/Utility.java	Test SQL preparation statements add explanatory comments and // nosemgrep suppressions without changing execution or transaction handling.

Poem

I’m a rabbit with code in my ear,
Semgrep now hops away clear.
memcpy wears a charm,
SQL tests stay calm,
While umasks return as they should here.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	No real description was provided, so there isn't enough meaningful text to evaluate beyond the missing content.	Add a brief description of the code and test changes so the PR summary reflects the actual fix.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title matches the main change, which is suppressing Codacy/Semgrep complaints with nosemgrep annotations.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch spoc-621

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 duplication

Metric	Results
Duplication	0

View in Codacy

_{NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}