Skip to content

fix: remove authentication output and instruction limits - #328

Merged
mldangelo-oai merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
mdangelo/codex/allow-verbose-auth-output-20260810
Aug 10, 2026
Merged

fix: remove authentication output and instruction limits#328
mldangelo-oai merged 7 commits into
mainfrom
mdangelo/codex/allow-verbose-auth-output-20260810

Conversation

@mldangelo-oai

@mldangelo-oai mldangelo-oai commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Remove the arbitrary 64 KiB authentication-output limit and 4 KiB login-instruction tail limit.

Keep complete subprocess output and parse login instructions incrementally while preserving login URLs, device codes, account status, cancellation, and existing error handling. No truncation, replacement limit, credential heuristics, or new configuration is introduced.

Validation:

  • Complete SDK suite: 980 passed, 11 expected platform/integration skips.
  • Focused authentication suite: 15 passed, including large interactive/noninteractive output, complete instructions on long lines, and real cancellation.
  • Build, TypeScript, and Prettier checks passed.

@mldangelo-oai
mldangelo-oai requested a review from ianw-oai August 10, 2026 15:28
@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex security review

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 10, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: abc59bf4fd

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: abc59bf4fd

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: abc59bf4fd

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread sdk/typescript/src/auth.ts Outdated
Comment thread sdk/typescript/src/auth.ts Outdated
Comment thread sdk/typescript/src/auth.ts Outdated
@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 91f333f6f5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread sdk/typescript/src/auth.ts Outdated
Comment thread sdk/typescript/src/auth.ts Outdated
@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3df0a6fb7f

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3df0a6fb7f

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 3df0a6fb7f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread sdk/typescript/src/auth.ts Outdated
@mldangelo-oai mldangelo-oai changed the title fix: allow verbose Codex authentication output fix: remove Codex authentication output limit Aug 10, 2026
@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1d7fbe5aa0

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep it up!

Reviewed commit: edff69a2bf

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: edff69a2bf

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@ianw-oai ianw-oai changed the title fix: remove Codex authentication output limit fix: remove authentication output and instruction limits Aug 10, 2026
@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: dc98f4cf49

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread sdk/typescript/src/auth.ts Outdated
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: dc98f4cf49

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex security review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🚀

Reviewed commit: 11fcdf6338

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 11fcdf6338

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@mldangelo-oai
mldangelo-oai merged commit b0aeec8 into main Aug 10, 2026
17 checks passed
@mldangelo-oai
mldangelo-oai deleted the mdangelo/codex/allow-verbose-auth-output-20260810 branch August 10, 2026 18:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants