docs: add memory quality,forgetting and lifecycle RFC - #1652
Open
jiannnnyyyyy wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
jiannnnyyyyy wants to merge 1 commit into
jiannnnyyyyy wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Member
|
中英文rfc都需要 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue or RFC does this PR close?
Closes #1590
RFC:
docs/en/rfcs/0000_memory_quality_and_lifecycle.mdRationale for this change
Issue #1590 discusses how Memory quality signals, lifecycle validity, forgetting, and maintenance should be defined before implementation begins. This PR records the agreed design boundaries and evaluation plan in an English RFC.
What changes are included in this PR?
inactiveandsupersededentries.±2position displacement.MemoryRankingTracewithout changing public RRF scores or HTTP APIs.This PR contains documentation only. It does not change runtime code, persisted formats, or public APIs.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No released behavior changes. The RFC is a design proposal; implementation remains subject to review and future changes.
No public API, HTTP contract, or persisted-format changes are included.
How was this change tested?
uv run zensical build --clean --strictgit diff --checkNo runtime tests were added because this PR only adds documentation.
AI usage statement
OpenAI Codex, powered by GPT-5, was used to draft and review the RFC text. The final content was checked against Issue #1590, the repository RFC guidelines, and the existing PowerContext documentation.