Repository navigation
Unify saved findings and evidence in the existing Sources inspector - #1902
Merged
Paul Lizer (paullizer) merged 1 commit intoNov 7, 2026
Conversation
Keep answers focused, disclose retained findings and evidence on demand, and add content-free debug publication correlation. Co-authored-by: Copilot App <[email protected]>
Paul Lizer (paullizer)
merged commit Nov 7, 2026
da8d2ca
into
microsoft:paullizer-react-v2-ui
12 checks passed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
0.261.419and update user, control, logging, and fix documentation.This changes presentation and observability, not native Word comment extraction. The investigated body findings are not native comment records; the missing-comment cause remains unproven. No deployment, historical conversation rerun, new route, runtime dependency, or Azure configuration change is included.
Linked issue
N/A. The user declined creating an issue.
Release Notes & Latest Features
Is this visible to end users?
Is this admin-facing (Admin Settings, governance, deployment, config)?
Should this become a Latest Feature card?
Screenshot needed for the card?
Version bump
application/single_app/config.pyVERSIONthird segment bumped, or not needed because this is docs-onlydeployers/version.txtbumped, or not needed becausedeployers/was not changedApplication:
0.261.418->0.261.419. No deployer changes.Testing / validation
npm --prefix .\application\v2_ui run typecheck- passed.npm --prefix .\application\v2_ui run build -- --outDir ..\..\ui_tests\artifacts\saved-analysis- passed; existing large-chunk warning remains.python -m pytest .\ui_tests\test_chat_saved_analysis.py -q --tb=short -x- 74 passed.python -m pytest .\ui_tests\test_chat_saved_analysis.py -q --tb=short -k "unified_sources or citations_without_saved or conflicting_recorded"- final focused run: 6 passed, including measured 4.5:1 text contrast across desktop/mobile and light/dark themes.python -m pytest .\functional_tests\test_orchestration_analysis_citation_delivery.py -q --tb=short -x- 22 passed, including debug-off/on publication and failed-persistence behavior.python .\scripts\check_cosmos_response_boundaries.py- passed: 1,094 owners, 425 doubles, zero review gaps. All five execution-module owners were explicitly reviewed.python .\functional_tests\test_docs_app_surface_coverage.py- 7/7 checks passed; regenerated inventory is unchanged.python .\functional_tests\test_docs_site_quality.py- 6/6 checks passed.git -c core.whitespace=blank-at-eol,blank-at-eof,space-before-tab,cr-at-eol diff --check- passed.Affected-owner network-blocked storage contracts also passed (161 cases). The repository-wide storage-contract run was stopped in favor of affected-owner checks; no full-suite pass is claimed. Desktop/mobile screenshots were visually inspected using synthetic fixtures, not reconstructed historical conversation records.
Documentation
Updated the Analyze guide, chat-control reference, logging reference, and
docs/explanation/fixes/UNIFIED_SOURCES_SAVED_FINDINGS_FIX.md. Release-note approval was requested, but the user was unavailable; release notes remain unchanged pending approval.Security checklist
@swagger_route(security=get_auth_security())sanitize_settings_for_user()No Flask routes or settings-delivery paths were added or changed. Existing saved-result access controls remain in effect; telemetry excludes record contents and raw identifiers, and browser previews/build artifacts are not committed.