Repository navigation
Allow non-user input through existing chat actions - #551
Open
Connor Peet (connor4312) wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Connor Peet (connor4312) wants to merge 1 commit into
Connor Peet (connor4312) wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Remove the User-only dispatch restriction, regenerate schema and client documentation, and add shared conformance fixtures for non-user turn and pending-message input. Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
Connor Peet (connor4312)
enabled auto-merge (squash)
October 29, 2026 19:51
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Remove the User-only restriction from
chat/turnStartedandchat/pendingMessageSetso clients can submit the non-user origins already represented byMessage.origin.This intentionally stays scoped to removing the existing restriction. It introduces no new capability negotiation, authorization mechanism, or provider-delivery contract; human drafts retain their User-only restriction. The existing reducers already preserve non-user messages and need no implementation changes.
Fixes #542.
Validation
npm run generatenpm run test— 614 passing; typecheck, lint, metadata/changelog/fragment/generated verification and coverage all pass.npm test— 77 passing;npm run build.git diff --checkThe initial root test run encountered an existing local-only false positive in the redaction-marker test from ignored VitePress dependency-cache files. Validation passed with that cache temporarily moved outside the scanned tree; the original cache was restored afterward.