Skip to content

experiment_logs

GitHub Action edited this page Oct 16, 2026 · 4 revisions

iso_doc_type: "Report" iso_viewpoint: "DeploymentView" type: "operations" title: "Experiment Tracking & Telemetry Logs" description: "ISO 42010 DeploymentView / ISO 15289 Report documentation detailing the MLflow experiment taxonomy, metric schemas, and artifact layout." tags: ["iso42010", "okf", "report", "experiment_logs", "mlflow"] timestamp: "2026-10-01T17:50:00Z" generated: "agent:wiki-iso-documentation-standard" verified: "true" last_verified_commit: "073b5fd"

Experiment Tracking & Telemetry Logs

Purpose: Detail the telemetry schema, parameter tracking conventions, and artifact storage hierarchies maintained inside MLflow.


1. Experiment Schema & Naming Conventions

All runs are organized hierarchically under defined MLflow experiments:

mlruns/
└── <experiment_id>/
    └── <run_id>/
        β”œβ”€β”€ params/               # Model hyperparameters & split settings
        β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ max_depth
        β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ n_estimators
        β”‚   └── test_size
        β”œβ”€β”€ metrics/              # Time-series & scalar evaluation results
        β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ train_mse
        β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ test_mse
        β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ test_rmse
        β”‚   └── test_r2
        β”œβ”€β”€ artifacts/            # Serialized models and attestation files
        β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ model/            # MLmodel binary bundle
        β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ explanations/     # SHAP summary plots & feature rankings
        β”‚   └── signatures/       # SHA-256 InferSigner receipts
        └── meta.yaml             # Git commit SHA, author, and timestamp

2. Standard Metric Logging Schema

Metric Key Mathematical Definition Evaluation Target Logged In Job
mse Mean Squared Error Minimization TrainingJob, EvaluationsJob
rmse Root Mean Squared Error Minimization TrainingJob, EvaluationsJob
mae Mean Absolute Error Minimization TrainingJob, EvaluationsJob
r2 Coefficient of Determination Maximization ($ o 1.0$) TrainingJob, EvaluationsJob
trial_score Validation score per trial Optimization objective TuningJob

3. Engineering Lab Notebook Experiments Catalog

Experiment ID Title / Focus Deliverable / Artifact Location Primary Findings
EXP-2026-008 Deterministic Verification vs. LLM-as-a-Judge Bias evidence/evaluations/llm-judge-vs-pytest-benchmark.json Β· Lab Notebook Notebook LLM judge had 44% False Negative rate (11/25 defects missed); Pytest harness detected 100% of defects.

Related: Lab Notebook EXP-2026-008 Β· Production Operations Β· Tactical Design Β· Master Index

Clone this wiki locally