Skip to content

test(server): finish workflow reads before changing transcripts - #388

Merged
lastobelus merged 1 commit into
lastcode/mainfrom
port/upstream/claude-workflow-transcript-order
Oct 11, 2026
Merged

lastobelus merged 1 commit into
lastcode/mainfrom
port/upstream/claude-workflow-transcript-order

Conversation

@lastobelus

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The settled Claude workflow test can rewrite transcript files while an earlier snapshot is still reading them. An answer from attempt 1 can satisfy the retry wait before attempt 2 is collected, making the unchanged timestamp assertion observe the earlier event. This interrupted full package validation.

Await the existing frame-processing handshake for snapshots 001015 and 001016 before changing the next transcript. The two-line fixture repair changes no production code and retains the original assertions.

Upstream contribution: https://redirect.github.com/pingdotgg/t3code/pull/18192, source 8a5ec7b1cc7ddb9206a4852b95e10e1430692dcb. LastCode delivery is independent of upstream acceptance.

Validation: all 230 Claude adapter tests pass with vp test run apps/server/src/orchestration-v2/Adapters/ClaudeAdapterV2.test.ts --maxWorkers=1 --maxConcurrency=1; targeted lint and git diff --check pass. The original named case passed once before the change; no deterministic reproduction of the intermittent full-suite failure is claimed. All 227 adapter tests and targeted lint also pass on the upstream branch. Required GitHub checks validate this exact LastCode head and base.

Implemented with GPT-6.1 Sol in the Codex harness; diagnosis and fixture repair by Astra High.

Use the existing frame acknowledgement before changing transcript fixtures, retaining retry timestamp assertions.

Carry-Group: upstream-bugfixes
Carry-Upstream: https://redirect.github.com/pingdotgg/t3code/pull/18192 (8a5ec7b)
Carry-Observation: Await prior workflow snapshot reads before changing transcript fixtures; production behavior and assertions are unchanged.
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 11, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-11T11:08:52.809323Z 56648f6 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

Reviewed commit: 56648f613d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@lastobelus

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work!

Reviewed commit: 56648f613d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@lastobelus
lastobelus merged commit a3b4dfc into lastcode/main Oct 11, 2026
18 checks passed
@lastobelus
lastobelus deleted the port/upstream/claude-workflow-transcript-order branch October 11, 2026 11:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant