docs: audit gaps between task execution and persistent intent - #357
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Owner
Author
|
Self-review complete. Checked the source references against the audit baseline, re-queried #355 and merged PR #356, and verified the metric aggregates. The document distinguishes observed behavior, historical samples, existing mitigations, and proposed capabilities. The two-file diff contains no runtime changes or raw operational data; no unsupported claim of an implemented acceptance suite. No findings in this documentation diff. Residual limitation: live cross-domain behavior and recovery still require the proposed end-to-end evaluations. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Document an evidence-backed assessment of Agent-OS against the operator goal of persistent intent fulfillment across coding and non-coding work. Identify seven gaps, distinguish existing foundations from proposed behavior, and define staged delivery with concrete acceptance scenarios.
Correct the roadmap readiness claim and link the audit. This is documentation only: no runtime behavior, worker configuration, live objective, or scheduling changes.
Evidence and Review
Validation
The proposed behavioral acceptance suite and non-coding pilots are not implemented or claimed to pass by this PR.