Skip to content

ci(hypatia): standardise the wrapper caller id to the canonical hypatia - #19

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/hypatia-caller-id
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/hypatia-caller-id

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

The check a reusable-caller job publishes is <caller job id> / <inner job display name>. The estate's canonical required context is hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis (docs/audits/audit-hypatia-pin-orphan-2026-05-27.adoc), so the caller job must be named hypatia. This wrapper named it scan, and so published scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis — two names for one gate, and any requirement written against one is unsatisfiable in a repository that publishes the other (the defect class of hyperpolymath/tropical-types#17).

Rename only — the job body, its pin, its inputs and its secrets are byte-for-byte unchanged.

Audit-first, requirement-aware: this is --fix output from scripts/propagate-hypatia-caller-id.sh in hyperpolymath/standards (the script stages; it never commits or pushes). The repository's active branch rulesets were read before the rename — no rule here names the old prefixed context, so the published name and every requirement stay in agreement.

…tia`

The check a reusable-caller job publishes is `<caller job id> / <inner job
display name>`. The estate's canonical required context is
`hypatia / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis`, so the caller job must be named
`hypatia`. This wrapper named it `scan` and so published
`scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis` — two names for one gate, and any
requirement written against one is unsatisfiable in a repository that
publishes the other (the defect class of hyperpolymath/tropical-types#17).

Rename only: the job body, its pin, inputs and secrets are byte-for-byte
unchanged. Audit-first, requirement-aware sweep —
hyperpolymath/standards scripts/propagate-hypatia-caller-id.sh.
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 0acaefea-3c4d-4e29-9072-9ba4f51c2a9d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 975fc62 and 20a5dd2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (24)
  • GitHub Check: scan / rust-secrets
  • GitHub Check: scan / gitleaks
  • GitHub Check: governance / Live Actions policy (credentialed advisory)
  • GitHub Check: scan / shell-secrets
  • GitHub Check: governance / Exemption ratchet
  • GitHub Check: governance / Debt ratchet
  • GitHub Check: governance / Workflow security linter
  • GitHub Check: governance / Security policy checks
  • GitHub Check: governance / Actions lockfile verify
  • GitHub Check: governance / Check Workflow Staleness
  • GitHub Check: governance / Licence consistency
  • GitHub Check: governance / Allowlist Preflight
  • GitHub Check: governance / Code quality + docs
  • GitHub Check: governance / Guix packaging policy (Nix retired)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Trusted-base reduction policy
  • GitHub Check: governance / Well-Known (RFC 9116 + RSR)
  • GitHub Check: governance / Language / package anti-pattern policy
  • GitHub Check: Hypatia neurosymbolic scan
  • GitHub Check: panic-attack assail
  • GitHub Check: invalid corpus (positive control)
  • GitHub Check: .deed-only discovery (regression)
  • GitHub Check: valid corpus (strict)
  • GitHub Check: shellcheck
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml (1)

19-19: LGTM!


📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Renamed the reusable Hypatia security-scan job in the CI workflow. No user-visible functionality or behaviour has changed.

Walkthrough

The reusable Hypatia security-scan job is renamed from scan to hypatia. Permissions and workflow invocation remain unchanged.

Changes

Hypatia workflow

Layer / File(s) Summary
Rename Hypatia scan job
.github/workflows/hypatia-scan.yml
The job identifier changes from scan to hypatia. Permissions and the reusable workflow invocation remain unchanged.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Bug fix

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: standardising the Hypatia reusable-caller job ID to hypatia.
Description check ✅ Passed The description explains the defect, the intended rename, the unchanged job properties, and the ruleset verification. It does not use the template headings or provide an explicit test result, but it c…
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

A rabbit sees the name now clear
Hypatia hops where scans appear
The workflow keeps its steady track
No permissions change, no steps roll back
One small name leads the way
Clean and calm through every day

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit 8c18135 into main Sep 20, 2026
25 of 27 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the fix/hypatia-caller-id branch September 20, 2026 23:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant