[indietyp]

🌟 Purpose

Currently we have n different configs:

• brunch (oxlint): strict and loose
• petrinaut (oxlint)
• eslint strict (harpc)
• eslint legacy (everything else)

The long-term desire is to move to oxlint instead of eslint. We first start with a maximally restrictive set, much like in Rust, and then allow the things that we do not want. In liue of #10013, the effect, vitest and node have already been tuned, with the next and react ones needing some additional work. That is expected to be backported once other libraries are ported.

🔍 Changes

• createConfig selects the runtime and framework rules, including Effect's native strict preset. Existing Oxlint consumers share tool versions through the Yarn catalog without adopting the new policy automatically.
• The hash plugin checks naming, visibility and options-object parameters. Type assertions, lint suppressions and literal rule settings require explanations. Rule severities use allow, warn and deny, with autofixes for equivalent ESLint spellings.
• yarn prepare:oxlint patches Oxlint for the Effect checks without replacing TypeScript or adding an install hook. Turbo runs preparation without caching because its artifact cache cannot restore changes inside node_modules.
• Packages' lint:oxlint tasks run through Turbo and the affected-package lint workflow. See libs/@local/oxlint/README.md for adoption and configuration examples.

⚠️ Known issues

React and Next.js selections are provisional. The tuned configurations cover vanilla TypeScript, Effect and Vitest. Missing are also: storybook, ladle, and such.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
hash	Error		Oct 26, 2026 11:31am UTC
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Oct 26, 2026 11:31am UTC
petrinaut-docs	Ready	Preview	Oct 26, 2026 11:31am UTC

1 Skipped Deployment

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Oct 26, 2026 11:31am UTC

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 68.08%. Comparing base (91c0f2b) to head (d92e797).

Additional details and impacted files

@@                       Coverage Diff                       @@
##           bm/fe-1861-upgrade-to-effect-4   #10012   +/-   ##
===============================================================
  Coverage                           68.08%   68.08%           
===============================================================
  Files                                2016     2016           
  Lines                              206824   206824           
  Branches                             8932     8932           
===============================================================
  Hits                               140818   140818           
  Misses                              64267    64267           
  Partials                             1739     1739           

Flag	Coverage Δ
local.harpc-client	52.96% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

1 warning

⚠️ Unable to measure the execution of 6 benchmarks

These benchmarks measured no execution time, so their results are not comparable and count as unchanged. This usually happens when the compiler removes the code under test.

Prevent compiler optimizations

See affected benchmarks

✅ 98 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing bm/fe-1945-introduce-shared-strict-oxlint-configuration (d92e797) with bm/fe-1861-upgrade-to-effect-4 (91c0f2b)}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$22.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.632 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1002	$$11.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.664 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$38.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 430 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.719 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1527	$$22.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 344 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.039 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$24.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 52	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$4.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 45.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.633 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 108	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.219 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$3.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.349 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.179 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 2	$$2.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.814 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$2.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 27	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.897 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.492 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$26.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.629 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$56.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 697 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.834 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 750 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.457 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.051 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$33.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 246 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.039 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$26.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.885 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$330 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.23 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.428 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$69.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 491 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.827 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$58.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 464 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.302 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$228 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.16 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.735 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$8.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$8.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.066 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$8.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.850 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$8.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.591 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$8.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.486 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$9.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 474 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$8.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.976 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$8.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 47.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.011 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$8.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 60.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.738 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$8.52 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.103 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$8.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$8.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$8.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.141 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$8.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.093 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$8.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.458 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$8.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$8.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.061 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$8.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$8.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.018 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$6.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.765 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$51.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 488 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.822 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$94.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 598 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.514 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$55.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 430 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.215 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$64.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 506 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.920 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$73.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.00 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$77.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 595 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$39.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$62.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 380 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$45.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$52.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 358 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$52.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 521 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.877 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$53.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 388 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$93.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 591 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 629 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.220 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$407 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.31 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-4.194 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:

• ❌ 1 vulnerable package(s)
• ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
• ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
• ⚠️ 1 package(s) with unknown licenses.

View full job summary