Skip to content

Paseo Approvals #1225

Closed as not planned
Closed as not planned

Description

@delirious6423

Source

git:delirious6423/paseo-approvals

Categories

  • Daemon management
  • Themes
  • Providers
  • Orchestration
  • Git
  • Workspaces
  • Sidebar
  • Extras
  • Utils

Review reference

Please review commit b8df881 of Paseo Approvals.

A shared human review screen for immutable requests from trusted local app connectors. Approval records a decision only; each app must enforce it separately when committing. Requires Paseo client and daemon 0.13.0+. The historical manifest ID standardnotes-approvals is retained for compatibility; the plugin supports portable app connectors and an optional separately installed Standard Notes approval bridge.

Listing and screenshots

Author overview and both screenshot assets are included in the manifest/package. Screenshots use synthetic File actions data, captured from the actual review panel in a disposable Linux VM, not a native phone.

Synthetic review panel, dark

Light screenshot

Setup, access and verification

No preparation command, runtime dependency installation, new listener or telemetry. Paseo supplies runtime libraries. Explicitly configured connector commands run as the daemon user and inherit its environment; paired trusted clients can edit this configuration. Previews use the existing Paseo transport and may traverse its relay. The plugin is not a sandbox or a human-authentication boundary. These limits are disclosed in the overview and security documentation.

Hosted source checks passed. Disposable-VM evidence covers 22 unit tests across five OS/architecture targets, native connector/process checks, and Linux browser plus isolated Paseo compilation/RPC. POSIX signal refinements passed on Linux x64/ARM64 and macOS ARM64; cooperative signals are not applicable to Windows force-termination. Native Android/iOS rendering remains unverified. See test scope.

Activity

  1. delirious6423 commented on Oct 26, 2026

    @delirious6423
    Author

    Superseded by the correctly labeled web-form submission #1226. Review context and screenshots are attached there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions