Skip to content

Rethink the default branch name suggestion #151

Description

@geofflamrock

Currently we suggest a default branch based on the stack name plus the number of branches e.g. My new feature -> my-new-feature-4.

This is fine but it's hard to tell any context from this branch name when you look at a list of branches, I'm finding it hard to know which branch contained which changes from the name alone. It might be better to suggest some sort of prefix and have the user type in the rest e.g. My new feature -> my-new-feature-{you_fill_in_something_meaningful_here}.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions