Fix: item notes not populating

[santipalenque]

https://app.clickup.com/t/9014802374/86bc2ha22

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes

  • Cart form responses are now preserved as received, including item notes and metadata.
  • Missing user notes no longer overwrite existing note data.
  • Empty cart responses are retained without modification.

• Tests

  • Added coverage for preserving complete cart form items and response metadata.
  • Added tests for missing notes, existing note retention, and responses containing no items.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Essentials

Run ID: 6b30f3b0-fc95-492e-b24d-ba1878a9d380

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f6d621 and 367dcba.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• src/reducers/sponsors/__tests__/sponsor-page-cart-list-reducer.test.js
• src/reducers/sponsors/sponsor-page-cart-list-reducer.js

Included review availability: 2 reviews are currently available. Your included PR review attempts over the past 7 days set your current allowance at 5 reviews per hour.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

RECEIVE_CART_FORM now stores the response directly in cartForm. Tests verify preservation of item fields, notes, metadata, and itemless responses.

Changes

Cart form preservation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Direct cart-form storage and validation src/reducers/sponsors/sponsor-page-cart-list-reducer.js, src/reducers/sponsors/__tests__/sponsor-page-cart-list-reducer.test.js	The reducer stores RECEIVE_CART_FORM responses without transforming item notes. Tests verify complete item preservation, missing user_notes handling, and unchanged itemless responses.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Change: Bug fix

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 367dc

The cart-form response is stored without lossy item normalization, with coverage for item fields, notes, and itemless responses. No merge-blocking risk is identified.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: fixing item notes that were not populating.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 2…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}