Align AI usage policy with NLnet guidance - #54
Merged
Conversation
2chanhaeng
previously approved these changes
Aug 19, 2026
2chanhaeng
left a comment
2chanhaeng
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just one inconsistent spelling error.
sij411
previously approved these changes
Aug 19, 2026
Apply NLnet's transparency, provenance, licensing, and human-review requirements to AI-assisted DrFed work. Narrow the maintainer exemption and synchronize the contributor guide with the new commit rules. Refresh the example model identifiers and correct the documented check list and build pipeline. AI provenance: Codex was asked in Korean to compare DrFed's policy with NLnet's GenAI policy and update the documentation. It drafted the policy text and examples; the maintainer chose the scope, provenance approach, and current model identifiers. Claude Fable 5 found two pre-existing inaccuracies in the contributor guide. Codex verified them against mise.toml and corrected them. The result passed Markdown formatting, the full mise check, the standard build, and a clean Fable re-review. https://nlnet.nl/foundation/policies/generativeAI/ Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.6-sol Assisted-by: Claude Code:claude-fable-5
github-project-automation
Bot
moved this from In progress
to Done
in NLnet NGI0 Commons Fund (2026)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
DrFed's existing policy treated AI mainly as a gate for outside contributions. That was not enough for NLnet-funded work, where maintainers also need to show how generated material was produced and verified.
How
The revised policy keeps outside-contribution restrictions narrow, while applying disclosure, human review, attribution, and licensing rules to everyone. Git commit bodies provide durable provenance through short English summaries without requiring raw prompt transcripts. The policy also separates generative AI from deterministic automation and requires contributors to understand, test, and license the result.
CONTRIBUTING.md repeats the commit requirements so agents that load AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md see them before working.
AI assistance
Codex (gpt-5.6-sol) drafted and revised the policy and this PR description under maintainer direction. Claude Fable 5 reviewed the diff and identified two stale descriptions in CONTRIBUTING.md, which were checked against mise.toml and corrected.