docs: correct product descriptions in CLMS filenaming guidelines - #77
Conversation
Apply Lorenzo's feedback: - Attribute IW burst to Sentinel-1 swath, not EGMS InSAR - Rephrase EGMS L3 grid and L2 orbit descriptions with their official labels
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: c7b58417d8
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| ├── L3-U, L3-EW EGMS velocity components (EGMS Ortho – L3) | ||
| │ | ||
| ├── L2a-A, L2a-D, L2b-A, L2b-D EGMS calibrated (EGMS L2) | ||
| ├── L2a-A, L2a-D, L2b-A, L2b-D Orbit (EGMS Calibrated – L2) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Because this branch includes both L2a-A/D and L2b-A/D, describing the entire group as “EGMS Calibrated” misidentifies the L2a variants. The repository's EGMS product description identifies L2a as Basic (DOCS/European_Ground_Motion_Service/Product_Description_v3.qmd:51-61) and L2b as Calibrated (:63-67, :446-448); split the labels or name both product levels here.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
2 participants
Apply Lorenzo's feedback to the CLMS filenaming guidelines:
validate_qmd_files.py: 36/36 valid.