Skip to content

should the screen attribute in Layout really be optional? #32

Description

@tomjnixon

In the EAR reference code, the screen is always present, but set to some default dimensions if not specified.

Handling the case where there is no screen (and skipping screen-related processing) might be desirable, but is non-standard -- should we get rid of the boost::optional wrapper (changing the API), or just set it to a default value and complain if it's reset to boost::none by the user?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions