[pedrobpereira]

Changes

The CLI project no longer builds a Docker image through sbt publish/publishLocal. The image is now only built from the Dockerfile in CI.

Manual Testing

• sbt codacyAnalysisCli/publishLocal succeeds without a Docker build, and the core and toolRepositoryRemote jars still publish
• Not tested: a real sbt +publish to S3

[codacy-production]

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage ∅ diff coverage · +0.00% coverage variation

Metric	Results
Coverage variation	✅ +0.00% coverage variation (-0.50%)
Diff coverage	✅ ∅ diff coverage (50.00%)

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (dd61b2e)	1285	1048	81.56%
Head commit (7a9afd0)	1285 (+0)	1048 (+0)	81.56% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#566)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

AI Reviewer: first review requested successfully. AI can make mistakes. Always validate suggestions.

_{TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.}

[codacy-production]

Pull Request Overview

✅ No blocking issues noticed

No blocking code findings were identified. The acceptance criteria remain unverified because no automated tests or coverage data were provided, including the real sbt publishing path.

About this PR

• Please add or run automated checks covering the sbt publish/publishLocal behavior, preservation of core and toolRepositoryRemote JAR publishing, and the CI Dockerfile build path.

Test suggestions

• Run codacyAnalysisCli/publishLocal and verify no Docker build occurs.
• Run sbt publish and verify no CLI Docker image is built or published.
• Verify core and toolRepositoryRemote JARs still publish.
• Verify the CI Dockerfile build remains the Docker image build path.

Prompt proposal for missing tests

Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Run codacyAnalysisCli/publishLocal and verify no Docker build occurs.
2. Run sbt publish and verify no CLI Docker image is built or published.
3. Verify core and toolRepositoryRemote JARs still publish.
4. Verify the CI Dockerfile build remains the Docker image build path.

_{TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback}

[codacy-production]

Pull Request Overview

✅ No blocking issues noticed

No new blocking findings were identified. The acceptance criteria remain unverified by automated tests, including preservation of JAR publishing and the CI Dockerfile workflow.

Test suggestions

• Verify codacyAnalysisCli/publishLocal completes without invoking a Docker build.
• Verify core and toolRepositoryRemote JARs still publish after the CLI publish configuration changes.
• Verify a real sbt +publish does not attempt to publish the CLI Docker image.

Prompt proposal for missing tests

Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Verify codacyAnalysisCli/publishLocal completes without invoking a Docker build.
2. Verify core and toolRepositoryRemote JARs still publish after the CLI publish configuration changes.
3. Verify a real sbt +publish does not attempt to publish the CLI Docker image.

_{TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback}