Repository navigation
Additional centroid (and shallowest) tree decomposition implementation - #119
Closed
bjorn-martinsson wants to merge 8 commits into
Closed
bjorn-martinsson wants to merge 8 commits into
bjorn-martinsson wants to merge 8 commits into
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
I messed up something with my branches and commits. Closing this PR and opened a new proper one #120 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently Pyrival has a centroid decomposition implementation that I'm rather fond of. But after learning of shallowest tree decomposition and writing a blog about it https://codeforces.com/blog/entry/125018 I've realized that there is another style of implementation that is nice to have.
This PR contains two algorithms. It contains a centroid decomposition implementation and an implementation of shallowest tree decomposition. The two are designed to be easily swapped, which is very nice. Especially if you want to experiment with comparing runtimes.
However, I am unsure of what do with the old centroid decomposition implementation. I personally would probably like to keep both. But I'm not sure what to call the files to make this clear.