[DO NOT MERGE] Test combined CI fixes - #319
ethanmusser wants to merge 10 commits into
Conversation
…est/2026-10-01-ci-various-fixes
…nmusser/test/2026-10-01-ci-various-fixes
… ethanmusser/test/2026-10-01-ci-various-fixes
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
This header is required due to usage of `std::abs` in this source file.
…/test/2026-10-01-ci-various-fixes
|
FYI @mattalvarado: I think this combination of changes should fix all of the current CI failures. So I would treat #315, #316, #317, #318, and #320 all as valid/functional changes assuming you agree with them otherwise. In general, seems like these CI failures fell into a few categories:
In either case, these issues were only discovered because the CI does not pin these dependencies and compiler standards. But at the same time the CI began failing as a result of the silent version bumps. Not sure if you have any opinions on whether these things should be fixed rigidly or if you prefer using the latest-and-greatest even if silent CI failures will crop up. |
Combines #315, #316, #317, #318, and #320 in a single branch to see if CI issues are resolved. This is purely for testing. Don't merge this, merge the individual PRs.