Skip to content

docs: Improve docs on publishing Actors and move README topic - #2801

Open
szaganek wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
update-publish-actor-docs
Open

docs: Improve docs on publishing Actors and move README topic#2801
szaganek wants to merge 4 commits into
masterfrom
update-publish-actor-docs

Conversation

@szaganek

@szaganek szaganek commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • Deletes horrendous screenshots.
  • Rewrites the topic on publishing Actors into a procedure.
  • Updates information on publishing Actor's source code.
  • Moves topic on README from Academy to Actor docs.

Closes #2623.

@szaganek
szaganek requested a review from TC-MO July 23, 2026 12:09
@szaganek szaganek self-assigned this Jul 23, 2026
@szaganek
szaganek requested a review from honzajavorek as a code owner July 23, 2026 12:09
@szaganek szaganek added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation. t-docs Issues owned by technical writing team. labels Jul 23, 2026
@apify-service-account

apify-service-account commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ Preview for this PR (commit 2f975335) is ready at https://pr-2801.preview.docs.apify.com (see action run).

@szaganek
szaganek removed the request for review from honzajavorek July 23, 2026 16:47

@honzajavorek honzajavorek left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't notice this PR is just about moving the pages, and I started reviewing the content. I noticed it before I got to "Publish your Actor", so I didn't review that one.

Feel free to ignore my comments, as they're not relevant to the changes you made (moving files around). But if I was to write a summary of my comments here, I'd say that I found no massive issues with the content, but:

  • It mostly ignores the fact we're living with AI assistants and AI search now,
  • and IMHO it jumps up and down in expectations from the reader. It's not clear if the audience is someone who just saw Markdown for the first time and learns about what README is, and needs some hand-holding, or if the audience is someone more seasoned who we just supply with ideas and links and they're good to go. This is the main weakness of the document.

I also posted several ideas on improvements.

Comment thread sources/platform/actors/publishing/publish/actor-readme.mdx
Comment thread sources/platform/actors/publishing/publish/actor-readme.mdx Outdated
Comment thread sources/platform/actors/publishing/publish/actor-readme.mdx Outdated
Comment thread sources/platform/actors/publishing/publish/actor-readme.mdx Outdated

- Explain in two or three sentences what the Actor does and the easiest way to try it. Mention the goals that the tool helps the user achieve. Describe the input. To grab user's attention, highlight the most important words in bold.
- List the Actor's main features and platform advantages.
- If it's a bundle, mention the steps that the Actor takes, and the obstacles it can overcome. Say upfront how many results users can get for free.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is a bundle, in the context of Apify? I use Apify but I don't know how to evaluate "if it's a bundle".

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When reading further, in the ### Pricing section I understand now that this is a way of paying for an Actor 🤔 While "pay per usage" and "price per result" are self-explanatory, the "bundle" mention got me confused. But it could be just me. Someone who has created an Actor and is writing a README for it probably knows these terms and doesn't need an extra hint. Leaving up to you, feel free to ignore this one.


Consider making images clickable. You can lead such clicks towards a signup page, which is possible with Markdown.

If your images are too big or occupy too much space, make them smaller with HTML.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This advice is ambiguous and for people who don't know a difference between display size of an image and resampling of an image it might be a bit misleading. We should somehow distinguish between "the image stretches too wide in my document, so let's limit it with HTML" and "the image has 20 megabytes or is 6500px wide, and I need a tool to cut the size down"

Comment thread sources/platform/actors/publishing/publish/actor-readme.mdx Outdated
Comment thread sources/platform/actors/publishing/publish/actor-readme.mdx Outdated
Comment thread sources/platform/actors/publishing/publish/actor-readme.mdx Outdated
Comment thread sources/platform/actors/publishing/publish/actor-readme.mdx Outdated
Co-authored-by: Honza Javorek <[email protected]>
@szaganek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks, @honzajavorek, great ideas for improvements! I implemented most of your comments.

Re: not-so-well-defined target audience, it's a problem throughout the docs at the moment. Hopefully the ongoing product changes will give us some pointers soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation. t-docs Issues owned by technical writing team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update Publish your Actor topic

3 participants