Skip to content

chore: sync community files - #180

Open
albert20260301 wants to merge 2 commits into
altertable-ai:mainfrom
albert20260301:chore/sync-community-files
Open

chore: sync community files#180
albert20260301 wants to merge 2 commits into
altertable-ai:mainfrom
albert20260301:chore/sync-community-files

Conversation

@albert20260301

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • add the shared funding metadata, issue forms, pull request template, code of conduct, contributing guide, and security policy
  • rename the semantic PR workflow to the shared .github/workflows/semantic-pr.yml shape with explicit pull request read permissions
  • normalize the MIT license text to the shared community-file template

Impact

This only changes repository community and workflow metadata. Runtime SDK packages and generated artifacts are untouched.

Verification

  • git diff --check

@albert20260301

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Shipow could you review this?

I picked you because path history is mostly bot-only and the stack fallback points to the JavaScript SDK monorepo. CI is just starting. The review focus is whether the shared community files and semantic PR workflow naming fit this repository's release flow.

@albert20260301

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Shipow this community-file synchronization PR has remained green and review-gated for five days. Could you review it when you have a slot? The branch was refreshed after the merged dependency work; its focus remains managed OSS metadata and the semantic-title workflow.

@albert20260301

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Shipow this remains green and review-gated after another three-day interval.

The branch is current with main; the focused review is still whether the shared community metadata and semantic-title workflow naming fit the JavaScript SDK’s release flow.

@albert20260301

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Shipow this remains green and review-gated after another three-day interval.

The branch is current with main; the focused review is still whether the shared community metadata and semantic-title workflow naming fit the JavaScript SDK’s release flow. Please review or indicate what should change.

1 similar comment
@albert20260301

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Shipow this remains green and review-gated after another three-day interval.

The branch is current with main; the focused review is still whether the shared community metadata and semantic-title workflow naming fit the JavaScript SDK’s release flow. Please review or indicate what should change.

@albert20260301

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Shipow could you review this follow-up?

I picked you because recent JavaScript repository history points to your ownership. CI is green; the focus is that the managed community-file sync remains repository-conventional.

@albert20260301

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Shipow could you review the workflow portion before this merges?

The full policy audit found that this branch renames the canonical .github/workflows/semantic-pull-request.yml to the legacy semantic-pr.yml, which keeps ubuntu-latest and an unpinned action. The community-file changes are independent, but the workflow rename should be removed or updated to preserve the canonical, policy-compliant workflow.

@albert20260301

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@francoischalifour could you review this?

The previous JavaScript reviewer is no longer on the core-team roster; path history offers no current core owner, so the JavaScript/TypeScript stack signal points to you. CI is green. The main focus is whether the legacy semantic-workflow rename should be removed or corrected before the otherwise independent community-file sync can merge.

@albert20260301

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@francoischalifour this remains green and needs a maintainer decision after the three-day review interval.

The only blocking point is the legacy semantic-pr.yml rename: should it be removed or updated to preserve the canonical policy-compliant workflow? The managed community-file changes are otherwise independent.

@albert20260301

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@francoischalifour could you review this when you have capacity?

This scoped change is still green and has had no reviewer activity for at least three days. The review focus is the unresolved legacy semantic-workflow rename: remove it or update it to the canonical policy-compliant workflow..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant