chore: sync community files - #180
Conversation
|
@Shipow could you review this? I picked you because path history is mostly bot-only and the stack fallback points to the JavaScript SDK monorepo. CI is just starting. The review focus is whether the shared community files and semantic PR workflow naming fit this repository's release flow. |
|
@Shipow this community-file synchronization PR has remained green and review-gated for five days. Could you review it when you have a slot? The branch was refreshed after the merged dependency work; its focus remains managed OSS metadata and the semantic-title workflow. |
|
@Shipow this remains green and review-gated after another three-day interval. The branch is current with |
|
@Shipow this remains green and review-gated after another three-day interval. The branch is current with |
1 similar comment
|
@Shipow this remains green and review-gated after another three-day interval. The branch is current with |
|
@Shipow could you review this follow-up? I picked you because recent JavaScript repository history points to your ownership. CI is green; the focus is that the managed community-file sync remains repository-conventional. |
|
@Shipow could you review the workflow portion before this merges? The full policy audit found that this branch renames the canonical |
|
@francoischalifour could you review this? The previous JavaScript reviewer is no longer on the core-team roster; path history offers no current core owner, so the JavaScript/TypeScript stack signal points to you. CI is green. The main focus is whether the legacy semantic-workflow rename should be removed or corrected before the otherwise independent community-file sync can merge. |
|
@francoischalifour this remains green and needs a maintainer decision after the three-day review interval. The only blocking point is the legacy |
|
@francoischalifour could you review this when you have capacity? This scoped change is still green and has had no reviewer activity for at least three days. The review focus is the unresolved legacy semantic-workflow rename: remove it or update it to the canonical policy-compliant workflow.. |
Summary
.github/workflows/semantic-pr.ymlshape with explicit pull request read permissionsImpact
This only changes repository community and workflow metadata. Runtime SDK packages and generated artifacts are untouched.
Verification
git diff --check