Skip to content
SavenkovIgorPublic

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Latest commit

 

History

64 Commits

Folders and files

Repository files navigation

Railing

Engineering guardrails that keep AI coding agents on track.

VS Code first

The plugin follows the Agent Plugins standard where it can, but the standard is not yet adopted by other vendors. Rules and agents live in com.github.copilot/, the only directory VS Code reads them from, so the plugin is VS Code first. Skills are plain SKILL.md files and travel to other agents more easily than rules do.

Contents

├── plugin.json                                  plugin name, version, description, Agent Plugins schema
├── com.github.copilot/                          the only directory where VS Code reads rules and agents
│   ├── agents/
│   │   └── gilfoyle.agent.md                    blunt code review and analysis
│   └── rules/
│       ├── global.instructions.md               general agent behavior and workflow guidance
│       ├── global-code.instructions.md          shared coding principles for C++, Python, JavaScript, TypeScript
│       ├── api-cpp.instructions.md              C++ API development guidance
│       ├── api-python.instructions.md           Python API development guidance
│       ├── markdown.instructions.md             formatting checks for all *.md files
│       ├── prose.instructions.md                how developer-facing prose reads, in all *.md files
│       ├── reports.instructions.md              universal requirements for agent-written reports in reports/
│       └── reports-overview.instructions.md     structure and checks for *.overview.md reports
└── skills/
    ├── bp/                                      validate files against best-practice references
    ├── debug-context-artifacts/                 inspect the initial AI context state
    ├── design-system/                           create or audit design systems
    ├── engineering-maturity/                    rank missing engineering practices by return on effort
    ├── migration-skill-factory/                 create skills for codebase migrations
    ├── reflect/                                 propose context improvements after a task
    ├── report-review/                           clean up a report and verify it against the code
    ├── report-write/                            write a technical report about existing code into reports/
    ├── review/                                  review a change against its intent, report only
    └── to-issues/                               convert plans and discussions into tracker issues

File links

Which rule and skill files depend on which. A solid arrow means "links to". A dashed arrow means that the applyTo scope of the file lies inside the scope of the target, so both attach together.

flowchart TD
    subgraph SK["Skills"]
        BP["skill: bp"]
        RR["skill: report-review"]
        RW["skill: report-write"]
        RV["skill: review"]
    end

    subgraph IN["Instructions"]
        REP["instruction: reports"]
        RO["instruction: reports-overview"]
        PR["instruction: prose"]
        MD["instruction: markdown"]
    end

    BP --> RR
    RV --> BP
    BP --> PR
    BP --> MD
    RR --> REP
    RW --> RO
    RO -.-> REP
    REP -.-> PR
    REP -.-> MD
Loading

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Used by

Contributors