Skip to content

Question about control branch #17

Description

@heishuini

I noticed that there are two noisy_lq_latents in the code, which are ultimately fed into the transformer by concatenating them in sequence. This approach results in higher computational costs. May I ask:

  1. Compared to this, would channel-wise concatenation be better?
  2. If only one noisy_lq_latent is introduced, restoration can still be achieved, but the performance seems worse than your sequence concatenation method. Is my understanding correct?
    Thank you for your reply!

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions