-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
[Bug]: Arbuthnot births vs baptisms #279
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
bugSomething isn't workingSomething isn't workingduplicateThis issue or pull request already existsThis issue or pull request already existsgood first issueGood for newcomersGood for newcomershelp wantedExtra attention is neededExtra attention is neededquestionFurther information is requestedFurther information is requested
Description
Activity
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
bugSomething isn't workingSomething isn't workingduplicateThis issue or pull request already existsThis issue or pull request already existsgood first issueGood for newcomersGood for newcomershelp wantedExtra attention is neededExtra attention is neededquestionFurther information is requestedFurther information is requested
Contact Details
[email protected]
Bug
And I just wanted to make you aware that on this page when you are talking about Arbuthnot’s baptism records, you do use “baptisms" and “births" interchangeably in some of the questions. A student who is very good at paying attention to detail was confused by questions such as Exercise 3 and thought they were supposed to find birth data separate from the baptism records in the data set.
I realized from the description of the data that Arbuthnot was probably using baptism records as a proxy for birth data, or at least I think that is what he was doing. If you could clarify that would be fabulous….
Hope you both are doing well.
Dr. Leigh V. Johnson
Reproducible Example
Jo here... I think the answer is just to change everything to "baptisms" and not ever say the word "births."
Expected Behavior
Wording change is needed
Session Info
No response
Additional context
No response