Release 2.3.0 — Tiers 10 and 11 - #159
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Both tiers in one version. Post-1.0 a version follows API impact and nothing else, and both tiers are additive, so two tags on the same tree would only make "when did that land" a question with two answers. Tier 11's release item records the same decision Tier 9's did at 2.2.0. Reconciling [Unreleased] against the log found two dependency groups that had landed with no entry, which is the gap this check exists for. One of them mattered: the official client going to 1.19.0 moved PointId out of its Points class and the comparison benchmark stopped compiling, with nothing to report it because the JMH source set was not part of `build`. Three numbers in the prose were stale and are now counted rather than recalled. The gRPC engine refuses sixteen operations, not the fourteen its own KDoc claimed and not the eleven the factory's KDoc claimed; quotas added two and nobody re-counted. The README said fourteen as well. `RestOnlyOperationsTest` drives every one of them, so the list cannot grow without the test growing with it, and the comment now says so. The release is a recompile rather than a jar swap, and the changelog and STABILITY say so with the measurement behind it: `git diff v2.2.0 v2.3.0 -- '*/api/*.api'` removes 132 lines, 114 of them constructors and generated copy on nineteen data classes that gained a defaulted property, 18 of them count and retrieve gaining routeAffinity. Nothing renamed, nothing removed. One thing moved before the tag because the tag is the last moment it could move: `payload` on CreateCollectionRequest was in the middle of the parameter list, which shifted every componentN after it, so a destructuring compiled against 2.2.0 would have resolved to the wrong field. Appended instead. A property added to the end of a data class costs a recompile; one added to the middle costs more. Topics re-ranked on measured usage rather than taste, filling the five free slots: mcp, model-context-protocol, ai-agents and llm for the volume people actually search, and kotlin-native at 673 repositories because it is low and it is the precise term for the thing no JVM client can claim. And the Awesome Kotlin badge (#143), at the end of the row. It is the same height as the other six so the row holds; its colours do not match the 0B0E17 labels and cannot be made to, because it is a fixed SVG served from kotlin.link.
|
This pull request adds no capability. The code it touches can already touch the filesystem (2 places). What I could not follow41 calls resolve to a name whose type is written nowhere, so what they reach is not established here. Across everything it read that is 41 of 633, 6%. That is too many to list, and where they are is more useful than which they are:
If one of those reaches the network or starts a process, this report does not show it. 9 files read · 7165 ms · against |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #104, closes #110, closes #143.
Cuts
2.3.0. Merge this and the annotated tag goes on the merge commit, which is what triggersrelease.yml.One version for two tiers
The tier-to-tag rule is pre-
1.0. After1.0a version follows API impact and nothing else, and bothtiers are additive, so this is one minor. Two tags on the same tree would make "when did that land" a
question with two answers. #110 records that decision the way #95 did for Tier 9 inside
2.2.0, and closesrather than waiting for a
2.4.0that should not exist.What reconciling
[Unreleased]turned upTwo Dependabot groups had landed with no changelog entry, which is exactly the gap that check is for. One
of them mattered:
io.qdrant:clientgoing to 1.19.0 movedPointIdout of itsPointsclass, and thecomparison benchmark stopped compiling with nothing to report it, because the JMH source set was not part
of
build. Both are now underInternal, and CI compiles the harness.Three numbers that were recalled rather than counted
The gRPC engine refuses sixteen operations. Its own KDoc said fourteen, the factory's KDoc said eleven,
and the README said fourteen. Adding the two quota calls made all three wrong and nobody re-counted:
All three are fixed, and the KDoc now names
RestOnlyOperationsTestas what keeps the number honest: itdrives every one of them, so the list cannot grow without the test growing with it.
It is a recompile, not a jar swap
Measured rather than assumed, because
apiCheckpassing on a branch says nothing about a release:114 are constructors and generated
copyon nineteen data classes that gained a defaulted property; 18 arecountandretrievegainingrouteAffinity. Nothing was renamed and nothing was removed. The changelogsays this and
STABILITY.mdhas the table.One thing moved before the tag, because the tag was the last moment it could.
payloadonCreateCollectionRequestsat in the middle of the parameter list, which shifted everycomponentNafterit: a destructuring or positional
copy()compiled against2.2.0would have resolved to the wrong field.It is appended now, and that removed 8 of the 140 removals this started with.
Topics, on measured usage
Five free slots filled, all 20 used.
mcp,model-context-protocol,ai-agentsandllmfor the volumepeople search by;
kotlin-nativeat 673 repositories because it is low and it is the precise term for thething no JVM client can claim.
The Awesome Kotlin badge (#143)
At the end of the row, after the identity group, because it is neither build state nor identity. It is
height="20"like the other six so the row holds. Its colours are#00a9ffand#f88909against the0B0E17labels the others share, and that cannot be fixed: it is a fixed SVG served fromkotlin.linkwith no parameters. So the choice was their badge as it is, or none, and a listing worth having is worth a
mismatched badge at the end of a row.
Still to do by hand, after the tag
the platform list and the highlights, and it is a Firestore document rather than a file here, so a
perfectly green release leaves it exactly as it was. The module count is now 14 and the version is
2.3.0.v1.19.0in its newest row. It is generated from a matrixrun:
KDRANT_UPDATE_COMPAT=1 ./gradlew :kdrant-transport-rest:jvmTest --tests '*QdrantVersionMatrix*'with Docker available, which this machine has not got.
automaticRelease = truelands in this release, so2.3.0should publish itself andthe new step will say whether every artifact resolves. That step has never run before, so it is worth
watching rather than assuming.