Repository navigation
Conversation
damonmcc
force-pushed
the
dm-lift-map-dev
branch
3 times, most recently
from
October 6, 2026 17:48
101b60d to
5e51742
Compare
damonmcc
force-pushed
the
dm-lift-map-dev
branch
from
October 6, 2026 18:58
fcd5b29 to
9ad4230
Compare
damonmcc
force-pushed
the
dm-lift-map-dev
branch
from
October 6, 2026 19:05
9ad4230 to
19f1aeb
Compare
damonmcc
force-pushed
the
dm-lift-map-dev
branch
from
October 7, 2026 19:23
85c13b4 to
36d8e9d
Compare
damonmcc
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 7, 2026 19:39
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
build runs on this branch
Makes
lift_supplemented_mapeasier to use in CARTO Builder and checks in the config for a dev copy of the LIFT Builder map, where we're trying Builder features before proposing them. The map under review and its table are unchanged.rlv_amount/siteprep_costsdollar text to numbers, andcd/councilto text.cp_remediationstays text since the dictionary calls it a description and it holds values like "Requested".lift_supplemented.csvkeeps DCAS's types, so the gdb layer no longer matches it column for column (FileGDB stores the booleans as 0/1)borough,is_lift_site,site_name,dcas_flags,community_district,cdta2020/cdtaname, andowned_leased/agency_owned_leased(13,711 owned, 34 owned and leased, 23 leased only, 476 with no agency use record).ahftfrom ADD POA (v2) and AHFT #2711 becomes a boolean, null outside the 59 districts AHFT ranks" STUYVESANT HIGH SCHOOL"," $384,202 ")redev_strategyandredev_priorityto their most common spelling (84 to 80 and 24 to 23 distinct values)community_districts_mapmodel and gdb layer (newdcp_cdboundariesinput) with each district's AHFT rank: 12 in the bottom 12, 47 ranked above that, 12 unranked. The map's council districts come straight fromdcp_councildistrictssince LIFT adds nothing to themdata_issues.mdlogsmoa_date's 2-digit years and Excel####values (no other source to recover them from),redev_prioritymixing time horizon, target quarter and strategy, blankjurison lots the City only leases, and the dictionary's wrong format forcd/councilmaps/has the dev map's config, a script to create a new map from it, and a README on loading the data and pushing changes. Pushing the config back and creating a new map from it both reproduce the dev map exactlyCI builds pass and match the local checks: 14,244 lots, 324 LIFT sites,
ahfttrue for 4,813 lots (39 LIFT sites), and a gdb with 14,199 lots (the rest have no geometry) and 71 community districts.