feat(cuda.core): add cluster scheduling policy to LaunchConfig by atiaomar1978-hub · Pull Request #2703 · NVIDIA/cuda-python

atiaomar1978-hub · 2026-08-26T00:17:31Z

Description

Add cluster_scheduling_policy_preference to LaunchConfig, mapping to
CU_LAUNCH_ATTRIBUTE_CLUSTER_SCHEDULING_POLICY_PREFERENCE via
ClusterSchedulingPolicyType (DEFAULT, SPREAD, LOAD_BALANCING).

Unlike stream synchronization policy (#2628), cluster scheduling policy is
documented as valid for graph nodes and kernel launches, so LaunchConfig is
the correct surface.

This is a signed re-issue of #2702 (same change, linear history on current
main). Commits are SSH-signed. GitHub would not reopen #2668.

Checklist

New or existing tests cover these changes.
The documentation is up to date with these changes.

Test plan

Native attribute mapping for DEFAULT / SPREAD / LOAD_BALANCING
Getter/setter round-trip for each policy
Driver enum acceptance; invalid value rejection; CC < 9.0 gate
Combined cluster + policy attributes
Hopper+ launch() smoke for all three policies
RunPod H100 80GB HBM3 / driver 580 / CTK 13.3 — 13 passed, 0 skipped
pre-commit.ci stubgen-pyx stubs regenerated

copy-pr-bot · 2026-08-26T00:17:35Z

This pull request requires additional validation before any workflows can run on NVIDIA's runners.

Pull request vetters can view their responsibilities here.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

Expose CU_LAUNCH_ATTRIBUTE_CLUSTER_SCHEDULING_POLICY_PREFERENCE on LaunchConfig via ClusterSchedulingPolicyType, with validation, CC >= 9.0 gating, and tests mapping to the native launch attribute. Closes NVIDIA#2629 Co-authored-by: Cursor <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

Assert LaunchConfig emits both CU_LAUNCH_ATTRIBUTE_CLUSTER_DIMENSION and CU_LAUNCH_ATTRIBUTE_CLUSTER_SCHEDULING_POLICY_PREFERENCE when set. Co-authored-by: Cursor <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

Use init_cuda with an inline noop kernel so test_launcher.py does not depend on the get_saxpy_kernel_cubin fixture from test_module.py. Co-authored-by: Cursor <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

…rough Align NVIDIA#2629 tests with reviewer guidance: round-trip each policy on LaunchConfig and exercise launch() for DEFAULT/SPREAD/LOAD_BALANCING. Co-authored-by: Cursor <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

atiaomar1978-hub · 2026-08-26T00:19:41Z

Hi @lijinf2 — when you have a moment, could you please review this PR?

This is the signed re-issue of #2702 (GitHub would not reopen #2668). It implements the plan we aligned on in #2629: LaunchConfig.cluster_scheduling_policy_preference maps to CU_LAUNCH_ATTRIBUTE_CLUSTER_SCHEDULING_POLICY_PREFERENCE (DEFAULT / SPREAD / LOAD_BALANCING), with CC >= 9.0 gating.

Tests follow your guidance (getter/setter plus a launch() run-through; no attempt to observe the live scheduler). On RunPod H100 80GB HBM3 (CC 9.0, driver 580, CTK 13.3) the cluster-policy suite is 13 passed, 0 skipped.

I do not have permission to set assignee or milestone on this account; cuda.core 1.3.0 would match the related work if that is still the right milestone.

Sorry for the force-push on this branch. I know rewriting published history is against the project rules. I did it only so the commits would be SSH-signed and show as Verified on GitHub. I will not force-push again.

lijinf2 · 2026-08-27T21:26:43Z

/ok to test c6c283b

github-actions · 2026-08-27T21:44:52Z

Doc Preview CI
🚀 View preview at https://nvidia.github.io/cuda-python/pr-preview/pr-2703/
https://nvidia.github.io/cuda-python/pr-preview/pr-2703/cuda-core/
https://nvidia.github.io/cuda-python/pr-preview/pr-2703/cuda-bindings/
https://nvidia.github.io/cuda-python/pr-preview/pr-2703/cuda-pathfinder/
Preview will be ready when the GitHub Pages deployment is complete.

CI test_subpackage_exports_are_documented[typing] failed because the new typing export was missing from docs/source/*.rst. Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

atiaomar1978-hub · 2026-08-27T22:27:17Z

Posted a docs fix for the CI failure on test_subpackage_exports_are_documented[typing].

ClusterSchedulingPolicyType was exported from cuda.core.typing but missing from docs/source/*.rst. Commit 39c9fc0843 adds it to api_private.rst (SSH-signed / Verified).

RunPod (RTX 2000 Ada, CC 8.9 — L4 community was out of stock; same compute capability as the failing L4 jobs):

test_subpackage_exports_are_documented[typing] passed
cluster launcher suite: 10 passed, 3 skipped (launch smokes require CC >= 9.0)

PR metadata is now set (cuda.core, feature, assignee, milestone).

atiaomar1978-hub · 2026-08-27T22:28:15Z

Hi @lijinf2 — could you please trigger CI again on 39c9fc0843?

The previous /ok to test covered c6c283bb5d3f. That matrix failed; this SHA has the docs fix and has not gotten a new GPU run yet.

Why CI failed

Every GPU job died on the same assertion — not on LaunchConfig or Hopper launch:

tests/test_api_docs_consistency.py::test_subpackage_exports_are_documented[typing] FAILED
E   AssertionError: public by cuda.core.typing.__all__ but missing from docs/source/*.rst:
E       ['ClusterSchedulingPolicyType']

ClusterSchedulingPolicyType was added to cuda.core.typing.__all__ but was not listed in cuda_core/docs/source/api_private.rst (the autosummary the consistency test reads). Example: linux-64 / py3.10 / CUDA 13.3 wheels / L4 — 1 failed, launcher cluster tests passed or skipped by CC.

Why it works again

39c9fc0843 adds the missing autosummary line:

typing.ClusterSchedulingPolicyType

That name is now present in docs/source/*.rst, so the export-vs-docs check passes. Runtime tests were already green.

RunPod replay (pod `7xp9vqqo44kk1s`, RTX 2000 Ada, CC 8.9)

L4 community was out of stock; Ada is the same CC 8.9 as the failing L4 jobs. HEAD on the pod was 39c9fc0.

############ CI FAILURE: docs export consistency (typing) ############
tests/test_api_docs_consistency.py::test_subpackage_exports_are_documented[typing] PASSED [100%]
======================= 1 passed, 5 deselected in 1.10s ========================

############ CLUSTER SCHEDULING POLICY TESTS (CI-like GPU) ############
compute_capability ComputeCapability(major=8, minor=9)
tests/test_launcher.py::test_to_native_launch_config_cluster_scheduling_policy[0] PASSED
tests/test_launcher.py::test_to_native_launch_config_cluster_scheduling_policy[1] PASSED
tests/test_launcher.py::test_to_native_launch_config_cluster_scheduling_policy[2] PASSED
tests/test_launcher.py::test_to_native_launch_config_cluster_scheduling_policy_accepts_driver_enum PASSED
tests/test_launcher.py::test_launch_config_cluster_scheduling_policy_invalid PASSED
tests/test_launcher.py::test_launch_config_cluster_scheduling_policy_rejects_pre_hopper_cc PASSED
tests/test_launcher.py::test_to_native_launch_config_cluster_and_policy PASSED
tests/test_launcher.py::test_launch_config_cluster_scheduling_policy_getter_setter[0] PASSED
tests/test_launcher.py::test_launch_config_cluster_scheduling_policy_getter_setter[1] PASSED
tests/test_launcher.py::test_launch_config_cluster_scheduling_policy_getter_setter[2] PASSED
tests/test_launcher.py::test_launch_cluster_scheduling_policy_smoke[0] SKIPPED
tests/test_launcher.py::test_launch_cluster_scheduling_policy_smoke[1] SKIPPED
tests/test_launcher.py::test_launch_cluster_scheduling_policy_smoke[2] SKIPPED
=========== 10 passed, 3 skipped, 61 deselected, 1 warning in 0.74s ============

Launch smokes skip on CC < 9.0, same as the L4 CI jobs. Pod has been deleted.

Full pod log (nvidia-smi + pytest; apt/pip noise omitted)

Thu Aug 27 21:56:33 2026
NVIDIA-SMI 570.195.03   Driver Version: 570.195.03   CUDA Version: 12.8
GPU: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

HEAD: 39c9fc0 docs(cuda.core): document ClusterSchedulingPolicyType in API RST
Fetching mini CUDA toolkit 13.3.0...
#define CUDA_VERSION 13030
cuda.core 0.0.0

tests/test_api_docs_consistency.py::test_subpackage_exports_are_documented[typing] PASSED
======================= 1 passed, 5 deselected in 1.10s ========================

compute_capability ComputeCapability(major=8, minor=9)
10 passed, 3 skipped, 61 deselected, 1 warning in 0.74s

Thank you.

lijinf2 · 2026-08-28T00:19:09Z

/ok to test 39c9fc0

lijinf2 · 2026-08-28T00:23:30Z

@atiaomar1978-hub Hey, there are 7 test cases, and it looks like some are redundant. Could we remove redundancy and merge them into at most 3 cases to reduce code maintenance overhead going forward?

atiaomar1978-hub · 2026-08-28T00:25:17Z

I will do now @lijinf2

Merge seven overlapping LaunchConfig cluster-scheduling tests into mapping, rejection, and Hopper launch smoke to cut maintenance. Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

atiaomar1978-hub · 2026-08-28T00:28:19Z

@lijinf2 folded the seven cluster-policy tests into three in 1a78ad5cd1 (Verified):

test_launch_config_cluster_scheduling_policy — ctor / getter-setter / driver enum / native attrs for DEFAULT, SPREAD, LOAD_BALANCING (including cluster + policy together)
test_launch_config_cluster_scheduling_policy_rejected — invalid value and CC < 9.0
test_launch_cluster_scheduling_policy_smoke — launch() for all three policies on Hopper+

Could you /ok to test 1a78ad5cd1cf0294d91994b0214ec71bdf9bdd2f when you have a moment?

lijinf2 · 2026-08-28T00:39:54Z

/ok to test 1a78ad5

CUDA 13.0.2's CUlaunchAttributeValue setter reads .value, so a raw int breaks native LaunchConfig conversion in CI. Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

atiaomar1978-hub · 2026-08-28T01:49:12Z

@lijinf2 CUDA 13.0.2 jobs failed on test_launch_config_cluster_scheduling_policy (AttributeError — that setter reads .value, so a raw int breaks). 3a90298eb1 passes CUclusterSchedulingPolicy instead.

RunPod replay (RTX 2000 Ada, bindings 13.0.3): mapping + reject PASSED; smoke SKIPPED on CC 8.9 (already passed on CI H100).

Could you please /ok to test 3a90298eb1e788047e702076b81dcdb28073e699?

…-2629-signed Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

lijinf2 · 2026-08-28T18:57:41Z

/ok to test 3a90298

copy-pr-bot · 2026-08-28T18:57:45Z

/ok to test 3a90298

@lijinf2, there was an error processing your request: E2

See the following link for more information: https://docs.gha-runners.nvidia.com/cpr/e/2/

Drop ClusterSchedulingPolicyType so callers pass DEFAULT, SPREAD, or LOAD_BALANCING without importing a new enum. Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

Cython types the argument as str, so only DEFAULT/SPREAD/LOAD_BALANCING are accepted. Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

atiaomar1978-hub · 2026-08-28T20:31:52Z

@lijinf2 addressed the review on c15bf56d51 (Verified): dropped ClusterSchedulingPolicyType, LaunchConfig.cluster_scheduling_policy_preference is now str | None ("DEFAULT" / "SPREAD" / "LOAD_BALANCING").

RunPod H100 SXM (CC 9.0), HEAD c15bf56:

test_launch_config_cluster_scheduling_policy PASSED
test_launch_config_cluster_scheduling_policy_rejected PASSED
test_launch_cluster_scheduling_policy_smoke PASSED

3 passed, 0 skipped. Could you please /ok to test c15bf56d51c1826b48c31608bae9e13fd52ca84d?

Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

lijinf2 · 2026-09-01T05:13:40Z

/ok to test c15bf56

copy-pr-bot · 2026-09-01T05:13:43Z

/ok to test c15bf56

@lijinf2, there was an error processing your request: E2

See the following link for more information: https://docs.gha-runners.nvidia.com/cpr/e/2/

lijinf2 · 2026-09-01T05:14:12Z

/ok to test d185a86

atiaomar1978-hub · 2026-09-01T05:17:40Z

Thanks @lijinf2 for triggering the CI builds and tests 👍

lijinf2 · 2026-09-01T05:18:39Z

+    'cluster_scheduling_policy_preference',
 )

+_CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICY_NAMES = (


Let's remove this variable and reuse _CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICY_TO_DRIVER dictionary keys. In future maintainance we hope less variables.

Done in e85fafe — removed _CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICY_NAMES; validation now uses _CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICY_TO_DRIVER.keys().

lijinf2 · 2026-09-01T05:21:20Z

+    )
+
+
+def _cluster_sched_policy_to_driver(value):


delete this function to use _CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICY_TO_DRIVER[value] directly.

Done in e85fafe — removed _cluster_sched_policy_to_driver; lookup is _CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICY_TO_DRIVER[value] via LaunchConfig._cluster_sched_policy_driver_value().

lijinf2 · 2026-09-01T05:23:54Z

+    "LOAD_BALANCING",
+)
+
+_CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICY_TO_DRIVER = {


Let's combine _CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICY_TO_DRIVER, and _validate_cluster_scheduling_policy_preference into a unified function (maybe _validate_cluster_scheduling_policy_preference or better name)?

Also, please put the unified function under LaunchConfig as a member function not global.

Done in e85fafe — merged validation into LaunchConfig._validate_cluster_scheduling_policy_preference (member method).

lijinf2 · 2026-09-01T05:27:28Z

+                    "cluster launch attributes are not supported on devices with "
+                    f"compute capability < 9.0 (got {cc})"
                )
+        if cluster is not None:


let's keep lines 142-150 unchanged and add compute capability checking to the unified function.

Done in e85fafe — lines 142–150 unchanged; CC check for policy is also in the member validator.

lijinf2 · 2026-09-01T05:33:50Z

+        attr.value.clusterSchedulingPolicyPreference = _cluster_sched_policy_to_driver(
+            config.cluster_scheduling_policy_preference
+        )
+        attrs.append(attr)


Why do we set twice? one at line 217-223, and the other at line 285-292?

The attribute is appended in two conversion paths until all modules are cythonized: the cdef _to_native_launch_config (cydriver structs) and the cpdef module helper (Python driver.CUlaunchAttribute objects). e85fafe factors shared driver lookup into LaunchConfig._cluster_sched_policy_driver_value().

lijinf2 · 2026-09-01T05:34:14Z

    assert (attr.value.clusterDim.x, attr.value.clusterDim.y, attr.value.clusterDim.z) == (2, 2, 2)


+_CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICIES = (


Let's remove _CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICIES and import.

Done in e85fafe — tests iterate _CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICY_TO_DRIVER keys instead of a local tuple.

lijinf2 · 2026-09-01T05:39:42Z

atiaomar1978-hub

@atiaomar1978-hub Hey, are you a human contributor or a code agent contributor? Your replies and code style read like automatic agent-generated content, with little human review/refinement.

atiaomar1978-hub · 2026-09-01T05:40:49Z

human + agent together and integration with RunPod to Test @lijinf2

…onfig Move validation and driver lookup onto LaunchConfig members, drop duplicate policy name constants, and reuse _CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICY_TO_DRIVER in tests. Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

atiaomar1978-hub · 2026-09-01T05:53:15Z

Addressed latest review feedback in e85fafe:

Moved cluster policy validation onto LaunchConfig._validate_cluster_scheduling_policy_preference (uses _CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICY_TO_DRIVER keys; CC check included).
Removed _CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICY_NAMES, _cluster_sched_policy_to_driver, and test-local _CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICIES.
Shared driver lookup via LaunchConfig._cluster_sched_policy_driver_value() for both native conversion paths.

RunPod (H100, CC 9.0, cuda.bindings 13.3.1): 3/3 cluster scheduling policy tests passed.

Ready for /ok to test e85fafe when convenient.

lijinf2 · 2026-09-01T05:53:45Z

/ok to test e85fafe

atiaomar1978-hub · 2026-09-01T06:42:32Z

The failing job Test win-64 / Python 3.14, CUDA 13.3.0 (wheels), GPU h100 (x2) (MCDM) (run) does not look related to this PR's code changes.

It failed during Configure driver mode (ci/tools/configure_driver_mode.ps1) while switching the Windows runner to MCDM and cycling the dual H100 devices. The job never reached artifact download or Run cuda.core tests.

On the same commit (e85fafe), builds, pre-commit, API checks, and the other Windows/Linux GPU test jobs passed. This matrix entry is the only dual-H100 + MCDM Windows job in the PR matrix, so this looks like a runner/infra flake rather than a regression from the cluster scheduling policy changes.

Happy to re-run that job if helpful. Cluster policy coverage was verified separately on RunPod H100 (3/3 tests passed).

atiaomar1978-hub · 2026-09-01T16:05:17Z

@lijinf2 When you have a moment, could you please take another look at the latest review feedback addressed in e85fafe?

The only failing check on that commit was the Windows dual-H100 (MCDM) job, which failed during Configure driver mode before any cuda.core tests ran. That looks like a runner/infra issue rather than a regression from this PR. If you agree, a re-run of that job (or a fresh /ok to test) would be appreciated.

Cluster scheduling policy coverage was verified on RunPod H100 (3/3 tests passed). Thanks again for the detailed review.

atiaomar1978-hub · 2026-09-03T16:40:19Z

@lijinf2 Friendly follow-up on e85fafe.

All review feedback from the last round has been addressed, and CI is now green on that commit — including the Windows dual-H100 (MCDM) job, which passed on re-run (previously failed during Configure driver mode before tests started).

Summary of e85fafe:

Validation consolidated on LaunchConfig._validate_cluster_scheduling_policy_preference
Removed duplicate policy constants/helpers; tests use _CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICY_TO_DRIVER keys
Shared driver lookup via LaunchConfig._cluster_sched_policy_driver_value()
RunPod H100: 3/3 cluster scheduling policy tests passed

When you have time, could you please take another look and let me know if anything else is needed before merge? Thank you.

github-actions Bot added the cuda.core Everything related to the cuda.core module label Aug 26, 2026

atiaomar1978-hub and others added 4 commits August 25, 2026 17:19

atiaomar1978-hub force-pushed the feat/launch-config-cluster-scheduling-policy-2629-signed branch from b00cd6f to c6c283b Compare August 26, 2026 00:19

This was referenced Aug 26, 2026

[FEA]: Support CU_LAUNCH_ATTRIBUTE_CLUSTER_SCHEDULING_POLICY_PREFERENCE in LaunchConfig #2629

Open

feat(cuda.core): add cluster scheduling policy to LaunchConfig #2702

Closed

lijinf2 assigned atiaomar1978-hub Aug 27, 2026

lijinf2 added the feature New feature or request label Aug 27, 2026

lijinf2 added this to the cuda.core next milestone Aug 27, 2026

docs(cuda.core): document ClusterSchedulingPolicyType in API RST

39c9fc0

CI test_subpackage_exports_are_documented[typing] failed because the new typing export was missing from docs/source/*.rst. Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

test(cuda.core): collapse cluster policy tests to three cases

1a78ad5

Merge seven overlapping LaunchConfig cluster-scheduling tests into mapping, rejection, and Hopper launch smoke to cut maintenance. Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

fix(cuda.core): pass cluster policy FastEnum to 13.0.2 bindings

3a90298

CUDA 13.0.2's CUlaunchAttributeValue setter reads .value, so a raw int breaks native LaunchConfig conversion in CI. Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

Merge branch 'main' into feat/launch-config-cluster-scheduling-policy…

db871e5

…-2629-signed Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

lijinf2 reviewed Aug 28, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread cuda_core/cuda/core/_launch_config.pxd Outdated

Comment thread cuda_core/cuda/core/_launch_config.pyi Outdated

Comment thread cuda_core/cuda/core/_launch_config.pyi Outdated

Comment thread cuda_core/cuda/core/_launch_config.pyi Outdated

atiaomar1978-hub added 2 commits August 28, 2026 13:15

refactor(cuda.core): accept cluster policy as a string

541e95d

Drop ClusterSchedulingPolicyType so callers pass DEFAULT, SPREAD, or LOAD_BALANCING without importing a new enum. Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

test(cuda.core): drop driver-enum cluster policy inputs

c15bf56

Cython types the argument as str, so only DEFAULT/SPREAD/LOAD_BALANCING are accepted. Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

chore(cuda.core): regenerate LaunchConfig stubs for pre-commit

d185a86

Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

lijinf2 requested changes Sep 1, 2026

View reviewed changes

refactor(cuda.core): consolidate cluster policy validation on LaunchC…

e85fafe

…onfig Move validation and driver lookup onto LaunchConfig members, drop duplicate policy name constants, and reuse _CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICY_TO_DRIVER in tests. Signed-off-by: Omar Atie <[email protected]>

atiaomar1978-hub requested a review from lijinf2 September 1, 2026 06:04

atiaomar1978-hub mentioned this pull request Sep 4, 2026

[FEA]: Support CU_LAUNCH_ATTRIBUTE_PROGRAMMATIC_EVENT in LaunchConfig #2630

Open

3 tasks

		assert (attr.value.clusterDim.x, attr.value.clusterDim.y, attr.value.clusterDim.z) == (2, 2, 2)


		_CLUSTER_SCHED_POLICIES = (

		)


		def _cluster_sched_policy_to_driver(value):

Uh oh!

Conversation

atiaomar1978-hub commented Aug 26, 2026

Description

Checklist

Test plan

Uh oh!

copy-pr-bot Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Uh oh!

atiaomar1978-hub commented Aug 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

lijinf2 commented Aug 27, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Aug 27, 2026

Preview will be ready when the GitHub Pages deployment is complete.

Uh oh!

atiaomar1978-hub commented Aug 27, 2026

Uh oh!

atiaomar1978-hub commented Aug 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Why CI failed

Why it works again

RunPod replay (pod 7xp9vqqo44kk1s, RTX 2000 Ada, CC 8.9)

Uh oh!

lijinf2 commented Aug 28, 2026

Uh oh!

lijinf2 commented Aug 28, 2026

Uh oh!

atiaomar1978-hub commented Aug 28, 2026

Uh oh!

atiaomar1978-hub commented Aug 28, 2026

Uh oh!

lijinf2 commented Aug 28, 2026

Uh oh!

atiaomar1978-hub commented Aug 28, 2026

Uh oh!

lijinf2 commented Aug 28, 2026

Uh oh!

copy-pr-bot Bot commented Aug 28, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

atiaomar1978-hub commented Aug 28, 2026

Uh oh!

lijinf2 commented Sep 1, 2026

Uh oh!

copy-pr-bot Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Uh oh!

lijinf2 commented Sep 1, 2026

Uh oh!

atiaomar1978-hub commented Sep 1, 2026

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

lijinf2 commented Sep 1, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

atiaomar1978-hub commented Aug 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

atiaomar1978-hub commented Aug 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

RunPod replay (pod `7xp9vqqo44kk1s`, RTX 2000 Ada, CC 8.9)

lijinf2 commented Sep 1, 2026 •

edited

Loading