Skip to content

ci: add GitHub Actions workflow - #3

Merged
t0kubetsu merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
ci/add-github-actions-workflow
Aug 12, 2026
Merged

ci: add GitHub Actions workflow#3
t0kubetsu merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
ci/add-github-actions-workflow

Conversation

@t0kubetsu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What

Adds .github/workflows/ci.yml, shaped for what this repo actually is.

Why it differs from the other modules

zoneripper is a standalone single-file script — no pyproject.toml, no package, no test suite. The module-package workflow does not apply. This runs the strongest gates available:

  1. Lintruff check zoneripper.py (ruff installed explicitly, since there are no [dev] extras to pull it in)
  2. Byte-compilecompileall, catching syntax errors on each supported interpreter
  3. Smokepython zoneripper.py --help, which exercises argparse setup and every module-scope import without touching the network

Step 3 is a real gate, not decoration: verified locally it exits 0 with dnspython installed and 1 without, so a broken install or import surfaces here.

Honest limitation

This is a floor, not a test suite. It proves the script parses, imports and starts — nothing about NSEC walking or NSEC3 hash collection is covered. Worth tracking real tests separately; the platform CLAUDE.md already records this module as the exception to the standard skeleton.

zoneripper is a single-file script with no package and no tests, so the
module-package workflow does not apply. Runs the strongest gates that do:
ruff, compileall across 3.11-3.13, and a --help smoke that exercises
argparse and every module-scope import (exits 1 when dnspython is absent).

This is a floor, not a substitute for a test suite.

Hardening: SHA-pinned actions, contents: read, persist-credentials:
false, concurrency cancellation, fail-fast: false, timeout-minutes.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@t0kubetsu, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 15 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8455271b-92cc-4966-9748-496ba22781e9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 180256e and b20ab1b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml
  • ruff.toml

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Greptile Summary

The PR introduces a read-only GitHub Actions matrix that installs dependencies, lints the standalone script, byte-compiles it, and exercises CLI startup.

  • Runs against Python 3.11, 3.12, and 3.13.
  • Adds an explicit Ruff rule selection and Python target.
  • Cancels superseded runs and disables persisted checkout credentials.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge.

No blocking failure remains.

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
.github/workflows/ci.yml Adds the Python CI matrix and its dependency installation, lint, compilation, and smoke-test gates.
ruff.toml Defines the Python 3.11 target and an explicit baseline Ruff rule set.

Reviews (3): Last reviewed commit: "ci: constrain the ruff install" | Re-trigger Greptile

Comment thread .github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated
The first CI run failed on every module, in two ways tracing to one root
cause: lint was never actually pinned down.

1. 'ruff: command not found' — ruff is required by the before-commit
   checklist but was absent from the dev extras, so pip install -e
   '.[dev]' never provided it. It passed locally only because developer
   venvs had it installed by hand.

2. Lint failures on a clean checkout — with no [tool.ruff] section the
   linted rule set is whatever the installed ruff defaults to, and that
   widens each release, so a green local run and a red CI run could
   disagree purely by version.

Copies the pattern portscanner already used (the only module that
passed): pin target-version, state select = [E4, E7, E9, F] explicitly,
add ruff>=0.6 to dev. No source change needed — every module passes this
rule set as-is.
Installing ruff unpinned made a required gate depend on whatever PyPI
serves that day, so an unchanged revision could start failing when ruff
widens its defaults. Floors it at the same >=0.6 the packaged modules
pin in their dev extras; ruff.toml already pins the rule set itself.
@t0kubetsu
t0kubetsu merged commit 402b4b5 into main Aug 12, 2026
4 checks passed
@t0kubetsu
t0kubetsu deleted the ci/add-github-actions-workflow branch August 12, 2026 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant