chore: add talhaensomble96 as codeowner

[Bekiboo]

Description of change

Adds @talhaensomble96 to CODEOWNERS so he can give the product-owner sign-off on this repo in plansombl, which reads its product owners from this file.

Type of change

• Chore (refactoring, build scripts or anything else that isn't user-facing)

How the change has been tested

Not tested: one-line CODEOWNERS change, no code affected.

Change checklist

• I have removed any unnecessary logic
• I have signed my commits
• I have self reviewed my code

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated repository ownership assignments. No end-user-facing changes.

[coderabbitai]

Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius.

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 89b692d7-5b69-41ed-8e06-b28caf79e0e5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 955bcaf and 117accc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/CODEOWNERS

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The .github/CODEOWNERS wildcard rule now assigns a second owner alongside the existing owner.

Changes

Code ownership

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Wildcard owner assignment .github/CODEOWNERS	The * rule adds a second owner.
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial)	~3 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 117ac

The added owner enables the intended product-owner sign-off, with no material merge-blocking risk evident.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: adding @talhaensomble96 as a CODEOWNERS owner.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains the change, classifies it as a Chore, and states the testing status. The Issue Number section is missing, and several checklist items remain unchecked, but the description is …
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}