Skip to content

GLSL_EXT_split_barrier - #337

Merged
gnl21 merged 2 commits into
KhronosGroup:mainfrom
wooyoungqcom:GL_EXT_split_barrier
Sep 9, 2026
Merged

GLSL_EXT_split_barrier#337
gnl21 merged 2 commits into
KhronosGroup:mainfrom
wooyoungqcom:GL_EXT_split_barrier

Conversation

@wooyoungqcom

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@Karpov-Ruslan

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Excuse me for interrupting, but are you sure that the new pair of functions split_barrier_arrive/split_barrier_wait is being introduced, and not controlBarrierArrive/controlBarrierWait? And should they map to OpControlBarrier, rather than OpControlBarrierArriveEXT and OpControlBarrierWaitEXT?

@wooyoungqcom

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

thanks for spotting the error. I uploaded the correct version. I don't know what happened, likely my sloppiness.

@wooyoungqcom

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@gnl21 We've got the internal clearance for the extension.

@pdaniell-nv

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gnl21 can you merge this asap as it's blocking CTS.

@gnl21

gnl21 commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is pending confirmation that we have legal clearance to accept the submission. I believe that was due to be confirmed today, but I will merge this as soon as I hear.

@wooyoungqcom

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@gnl21 If you are waiting a confirmation from me, i have already left one a couple of days ago. #337 (comment)

@gnl21

gnl21 commented Aug 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No, I am waiting for confirmation from Ralph. I believe that the conclusion from the recent meeting was that this would be discussed at a legal meeting on Friday (I incorrectly said, above, that it was going to be today).

@r-potter

r-potter commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No, I am waiting for confirmation from Ralph. I believe that the conclusion from the recent meeting was that this would be discussed at a legal meeting on Friday (I incorrectly said, above, that it was going to be today).

The legal meeting didn't happen for schedule reasons, but that was to address more general questions. Since we have explicit agreement on this one above, I believe it's fine to merge.

@gnl21
gnl21 merged commit 8541c70 into KhronosGroup:main Sep 9, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants