You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
etcd-auth / trixie: two VIP holders for 0.2 s while the holder was cut off, on a loaded runner #126
Seen in CI run 37892870474 (job etcd-auth / trixie, PR #124, which changes only tests). The sampler saw the VIP on the wg0 of A and of B in two samples, 0.2 s apart (t = 1791527330.62 and 1791527330.83).
When: step 6 of tests/etcd_auth_netns.py, A (the holder and the root's holder) cut off for the renewal test (renew_c_holder_cut, 10.1 s), then back (renew_c_holder_back).
The runner was loaded: three pull requests ran their netns jobs at the same time; another job of the same run measured a maximum RTT of 2.1 s on links that are 250 ms.
Expected (decision 0049): the holder's address has a valid_lft that ends RELEASE_AFTER (10 s) after its last confirmed renewal, and the other member claims only after the lease's TTL (20 s) plus GRACE. A gap of about 10 s should separate the two.
To find out: whether the kernel removed A's address late (addrconf's expiry timer on a busy workqueue; EXPIRY_SLACK is 1 s), whether A's controller carried the address again after the heal before it learned that its lease was gone, or whether B claimed early. The agents' logs in that run's RESULT line do not show the VIP controller's lines for that interval.
This is not caused by #121, #122 or #124 (they do not change the controller, the lease or the address lifetime), but it is a safety signal and must not be hidden by reruns.
Activity