Repository navigation
Description
Parent
What to build
emf/ reads as one flat list of six Eclipse bundles, and nothing in the listing says which of them a course examiner opens and which exist only for this repository's own evidence. The parity suite is the sharpest case: it reaches past the pipeline's interface into Pipeline, Parsed, Diagnostic and Descriptor, which is why parity/pom.xml is eclipse-plugin packaging while emf/docs/architecture.md says a module needing no p2 bundle stays a plain jar. That drift is live.
This epic closes it in the order the two decisions take: the parity suite moves onto the pipeline's file interface and becomes a plain jar, then the tree splits into bundles/ for what Tycho builds and Eclipse imports and tests/ for what only Maven runs, and the second tier is ported to Kotlin, the estate's JVM language.
Decided in 0120 and 0121, recorded in #126. Neither is implemented there: emf/docs/architecture.md still describes the tree as it is, with each decision beside it as a "proposed, not landed" note. This epic is what removes those notes.
Acceptance criteria
-
tests/paritybuilds as a plain jar, holds no EMF type, and resolves nothing from the target platform. -
EMF-010andEMF-011still fail on a fixture that breaks them, rather than passing on an empty class import. -
bundles/holds the five graded modules andtests/the parity tier;./mvnw -B -ntp verifyis green fromemf/. -
emf/README.mdanswers "where does this artefact live, and which task grades it" in one table. - Both "proposed, not landed" notes are gone from
emf/docs/architecture.md, because the tree matches what it says.
Blocked by
- None (can start immediately).
Activity