Benchmark table is not consistent (am I wrong?)

[tryanbot]

I read the paper and compare it to this website : https://www.indobenchmark.com/leaderboard.html . It seems that the sequence labelling benchmark is not the same. I also tried my own fine-tuning, and the result is closer to the one on the paper rather than that in the website. is there any explanation regarding this problem?

[gentaiscool]

Thank you for creating the issue. The numbers on the website is outdated. You can refer to the paper for the more updated results.

[tryanbot]

It seems the result on the web is better than that on the paper. If the one on the paper is the latest, how come the performance is decreased?