Skip to content

Document pins, mentions, blocks and contact preferences on the socket page - #156

Merged
sivert-io merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/GRYT-1656-push-docs
Oct 7, 2026
Merged

sivert-io merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/GRYT-1656-push-docs

Conversation

@sivert-io

@sivert-io sivert-io commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Twelve socket events the server already has and the page didn't list:

  • chat:pin, chat:pins and chat:pinned
  • mentions:list, mentions:seen and mention:new
  • user:block, user:unblock, user:blocks:list, user:blocked, user:unblocked and user:blocks
  • contact:prefs:get, contact:prefs:set and contact:prefs

The socket coverage check has a 70% floor. The three push:* events in Gryt-chat/server#283 put the server's side at 69%. This brings it to 75% with those three still missing. They can't go on the page until the server has them, because the docs side fails on events the server doesn't have yet, so they follow once #283 merges.

Checked locally against server main (187/245) and against #283 (187/248).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

… page

Twelve events the server already has and the page left out. The socket
coverage check has a 70% floor, and the three push:* events in
Gryt-chat/server#283 tipped the server's side to 69%. This lifts it to
75% with those three still undocumented. They can't go on the page
until the server has them, because the docs side fails on events the
server doesn't have yet. So they follow once #283 merges.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
@sivert-io
sivert-io force-pushed the claude/GRYT-1656-push-docs branch from a9cb0cf to a050d7f Compare October 7, 2026 11:28
@sivert-io sivert-io changed the title Document the push:* socket events (GRYT-1656) Document pins, mentions, blocks and contact preferences on the socket page Oct 7, 2026
@sivert-io
sivert-io merged commit 94f22c8 into main Oct 7, 2026
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant