Repository navigation
Conversation
deep-fields/scouting/tissue-electrical.md surveys tissue conductivity and permittivity data (DC to 100 GHz), ranks six leads, and lists what is crowded. The pilot in deep-fields/scouting/tissue-electrical/ cross-checks the three public tissue dielectric tables (IT'IS V5.0, Sasaki et al. 2014, NICT 2023) against each other and against simple physics. It downloads the source data at run time and runs in about 2 s. Findings, each a lead until the maintainers confirm: - IT'IS V5.0 alternative (Sasaki) set: Urinary Bladder Wall carries Sasaki Table 2 row 1 (Aorta), not row 2 (Bladder); also in the SQLite database's 4.2-sasaki and 5.0-sasaki versions. - Gabriel's bladder permittivity is 30-40% of NICT's and of the water-content trend. - The IT'IS "Water" entry: static permittivity 84.6 (water at 7.9 C) with the relaxation time of water at 24.4 C. - The Gabriel model at 100 Hz is more than 3x below the IT'IS low-frequency compilation for 11 of 22 tissues. Written by an AI agent (Claude); a person needs to review and sign before anything is sent to the database maintainers. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019ufYsydF4HnLV1dyESbvjY
Adds section 4 to deep-fields/scouting/tissue-electrical.md: the measured spectra settle the bladder question (a single-sample anomaly in Gabriel's 1996 data), the fluid excess at 10 MHz is in NICT's measurements, ICNIRP 2020 Table 10 differs from NICT's dermis spectra at 60-100 GHz, and the NHANES full spectrum adds little to 50 kHz for DXA lean mass and mortality. Points the pilot README to the projects that continue it. Written by an AI agent (Claude) working for Ahraz Arifuddin, who signs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019ufYsydF4HnLV1dyESbvjY
orda-aska
approved these changes
Nov 1, 2026
orda-aska
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Verified at 0b2471c. ./fetch.sh downloads the IT'IS and NICT tables, and audit.py exits 0. Re-running audit.py gives no diff against the committed results/*.tsv and results/summary.txt. check_site.py passes. Fetch artifacts are gitignored and the diff has no secrets. Non-blocking: the pilot needs numpy and pandas, as the README says.
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this changes
deep-fields/scouting/tissue-electrical.md, a sourced scouting report on tissue conductivity and permittivity (DC to 100 GHz), with ranked leads, a crowded list, and a same-day follow-up section.deep-fields/scouting/tissue-electrical/, which cross-checks the public tissue dielectric tables (IT'IS V5.0, Sasaki et al. 2014, NICT 2023). It downloads the source data at run time and runs in about 2 s.deep-fields/README.md.Results and their status
All claimed: not peer reviewed, and not yet confirmed by the database maintainers.
The work continues in Foundation-0/tissue-dielectrics (private for now) and Foundation-0/nhanes-bioimpedance. Their
mainbranches fill when their own pull requests merge.How to check it
Who did the work
Claude, an AI agent working for Ahraz Arifuddin. Ahraz Arifuddin signs for this change. Sasaki et al. (2014), which he supplied, was used to transcribe Table 2; the PDF is not committed. Under MERGE-SOP, a maintainer other than the author (zero-aska) approves before merge.
Not done: no links from the site pages yet, because two of the new repositories are private and none has content on
main.Generated by Claude Code