Repository navigation
Gate moving and creating reports for approve-only members #104905
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
flodnv
merged 18 commits into
Expensify:main
from
ShridharGoel:fix/create-report-upgrade-bulk-move
Oct 29, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c82f269
Fix unresponsive create report in move to report
ShridharGoel d3045f6
Remove useMemo and useCallback hooks
ShridharGoel 5599b64
Gate moving expenses for approve-only members
ShridharGoel f81f0fa
Fix move permission when policy is unblocked
ShridharGoel bbcc94a
Revert changes in DynamicIOURequestStepUpgrade
ShridharGoel 6d292fc
Simplify create report gating in edit report
ShridharGoel 90e94eb
Hoist isPerDiemRequest check out of loops
ShridharGoel da4f625
Deduplicate report counting in move permission
ShridharGoel abfdc2a
Remove unnecessary fallback for reportOwnerLogin
ShridharGoel 7a979ad
Deduplicate create report check in edit report
ShridharGoel 0937397
Address review feedback on move eligibility and test
ShridharGoel fc6dd4c
Allow admins to move expenses of approve-only members
ShridharGoel c26ac11
Scope move eligibility gate to members who cannot create expenses
ShridharGoel 3aa6afa
Fix shadowed policy params in move eligibility gate
ShridharGoel 54b69fb
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:Expensify/App into fix/create-repor…
ShridharGoel 1b81f78
Collapse move-destination checks into a single policy loop
ShridharGoel 730c027
Remove unreachable guard from createReport
ShridharGoel df24d63
Use suggested move-destination check
ShridharGoel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -453,6 +453,85 @@ describe('canEditFieldOfMoneyRequest', () => { | |
| // Then they should be able to move the expense since there are multiple outstanding expense reports | ||
| expect(canEditReportField).toBe(false); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should return false when the user has approveOnly role on the policy and no other workspaces', async () => { | ||
|
ShridharGoel marked this conversation as resolved.
Resolved
|
||
| // Given a policy where the current user only has approveOnly role and no other workspaces | ||
| const approveOnlyPolicy = { | ||
| ...expensePolicy, | ||
| role: CONST.POLICY.ROLE.APPROVE_ONLY, | ||
| }; | ||
| await Onyx.set(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.POLICY}${policyID}`, approveOnlyPolicy); | ||
| await Onyx.merge(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT}${IOUReportID}`, expenseReport); | ||
| await Onyx.merge(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT}${EXPENSE_OUTSTANDING_REPORT_1_ID}`, outstandingExpenseReport1); | ||
| await Onyx.merge(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT}${EXPENSE_OUTSTANDING_REPORT_2_ID}`, outstandingExpenseReport2); | ||
| await Onyx.set(ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_DETAILS_LIST, { | ||
| [currentUserAccountID]: { | ||
| accountID: currentUserAccountID, | ||
| login: currentUserEmail, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| await waitForBatchedUpdates(); | ||
| const outstandingReportsByPolicyID = await OnyxUtils.get(ONYXKEYS.DERIVED.OUTSTANDING_REPORTS_BY_POLICY_ID); | ||
|
|
||
| // When checking if the user can move the expense | ||
| const canEditReportField = canEditFieldOfMoneyRequest({ | ||
| rules: undefined, | ||
| reportAction, | ||
| fieldToEdit: CONST.EDIT_REQUEST_FIELD.REPORT, | ||
| outstandingReportsByPolicyID, | ||
| transaction: moneyRequestTransaction, | ||
| reportNameValuePairs: undefined, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Then the move action should be disallowed | ||
| expect(canEditReportField).toBe(false); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should return true when an admin moves an expense owned by an approveOnly member', async () => { | ||
| // Given an admin viewing an expense owned by an approve-only member | ||
| const employeeAccountID = 12345; | ||
| const employeeEmail = '[email protected]'; | ||
| const adminPolicy = { | ||
| ...expensePolicy, | ||
| role: CONST.POLICY.ROLE.ADMIN, | ||
| employeeList: { | ||
| [employeeEmail]: { | ||
| role: CONST.POLICY.ROLE.APPROVE_ONLY, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }; | ||
| const employeeExpenseReport = { | ||
| ...expenseReport, | ||
| ownerAccountID: employeeAccountID, | ||
| }; | ||
| await Onyx.set(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.POLICY}${policyID}`, adminPolicy); | ||
| await Onyx.merge(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.REPORT}${IOUReportID}`, employeeExpenseReport); | ||
| await Onyx.set(ONYXKEYS.PERSONAL_DETAILS_LIST, { | ||
| [employeeAccountID]: { | ||
| accountID: employeeAccountID, | ||
| login: employeeEmail, | ||
| }, | ||
| [currentUserAccountID]: { | ||
| accountID: currentUserAccountID, | ||
| login: currentUserEmail, | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
| await waitForBatchedUpdates(); | ||
| const outstandingReportsByPolicyID = await OnyxUtils.get(ONYXKEYS.DERIVED.OUTSTANDING_REPORTS_BY_POLICY_ID); | ||
|
|
||
| // When checking if the admin can move the expense | ||
| const canEditReportField = canEditFieldOfMoneyRequest({ | ||
| rules: undefined, | ||
| reportAction, | ||
| fieldToEdit: CONST.EDIT_REQUEST_FIELD.REPORT, | ||
| outstandingReportsByPolicyID, | ||
| transaction: moneyRequestTransaction, | ||
| reportNameValuePairs: undefined, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Then the move action should be allowed for the admin | ||
| expect(canEditReportField).toBe(true); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| describe('Policy has Dynamic External Workflow', () => { | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.