[Refactor] Move PolicyUtils vendor-matching helpers into vendor.ts by MelvinBot · Pull Request #103135 · Expensify/App

MelvinBot · 2026-10-06T05:07:48Z

Explanation of Change

PolicyUtils/index.ts is close to the 4000-line max-lines ESLint cap. Going over it breaks the build and blocks deploys and other PRs. This is step 2 of the agreed split: it moves the vendor-matching helpers into PolicyUtils/vendor.ts. It is a pure move, with no renames, signature changes, or behavior changes.

Added src/libs/PolicyUtils/vendor.ts with the block from isQBOVendorMatchingActive through getXeroSupplierByID. The moved lines are byte-identical to the originals.
vendor.ts exports the 22 helpers from the plan, plus getVendorFeaturePolicyIDs. That function sits inside the block, is already exported from PolicyUtils, and only calls hasVendorFeature, so it moves with the block.
isQBOVendorMatchingActive, isIntacctVendorMatchingActive, isCampfireVendorMatchingActive, and getActiveVendorMatchingVendors stay private in vendor.ts.
vendor.ts does not import index.ts, so there is no new cycle. Nothing left in index.ts calls the vendor helpers.
getQuickbooksOnlineIntegrationName (used by getVendorEmptyState) now comes from @libs/AccountingUtils in vendor.ts. The plan's import list missed it. The unused Vendor and TransactionCommentVendor imports were removed from index.ts.
getSageIntacctVendors, getTagApproverRule, and getValidConnectedIntegration onward stay in index.ts.
Callers keep importing @libs/PolicyUtils.
In PolicyUtilsTest.ts, every test for a vendor.ts function now sits under one describe('vendor') block, like the existing describe('tag') block. sortVendors moved into it. getXeroExpenseAccounts moved out, because it stays in index.ts.

index.ts drops from 3473 to 2939 lines.

One change from the plan: index.ts re-exports the vendor helpers with export * from './vendor', next to the existing export * from './tag'. It does not list them in the export { ... } block. With named re-exports, 23 Jest suites failed to load with TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'findVendorByID'). This is the same failure Phase 1 hit with ./tag. The existing comment above export * from './tag' explains why, and it now covers both lines. Only the 23 names in the export { ... } block of vendor.ts become public, so the 4 private helpers stay private.

AI tests run (by MelvinBot): npm run typecheck ✅, npm run lint-changed ✅, npm run fmt (no diff) ✅, npm run spell-changed ✅, full Jest suite in 4 shards ✅ (1688 suites passed, 1 skipped, 0 failed). I did not run the Storybook smoke test, because this PR changes no components. After the rename to vendor.ts: npm run typecheck ✅, npm run lint on the changed files ✅, npm run fmt (no diff) ✅, PolicyUtilsTest.ts ✅ (586 tests passed).

Fixed Issues

$ #102675
PROPOSAL: #102675 (comment)

Tests

Precondition: vendorMatching beta is enabled

Go to a WS
Enable Accounting
Connect to Campfire
Verify that Vendors appears in the workspace menu item
Open the Vendors page
Verify that the vendor list is displayed the same as in Production
Go Accounting > Export > Default vendor for all company cards
Verify that the list of active vendors is displayed

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as test

QA Steps

Same as test

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.13.52.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.14.35.mov

iOS: Native

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.14.59.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.13.25.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.11.20.mov

Co-authored-by: nkdengineer <[email protected]>

MelvinBot · 2026-10-06T05:08:04Z

I created this PR from an upstream branch since I don't have push access to your fork.

To take ownership of this branch and be able to push updates, run:

git remote add upstream https://github.com/Expensify/App.git
git fetch upstream claude-splitPolicyUtilsVendors
git checkout -b claude-splitPolicyUtilsVendors upstream/claude-splitPolicyUtilsVendors
git push -u origin claude-splitPolicyUtilsVendors

Then you can close this PR and open a new one from your fork.

codecov · 2026-10-06T05:11:05Z

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/libs/PolicyUtils/index.ts	`89.05% <ø> (-0.67%)`	⬇️
src/libs/PolicyUtils/vendor.ts	`93.68% <93.68%> (ø)`
... and 13 files with indirect coverage changes

MelvinBot · 2026-10-06T05:14:34Z

🤖 Android test steps verification results: ✅ pass

I exercised the flows that use PolicyUtils on standalone Android NewDot: Inbox, Workspaces, creating a workspace, the workspace Overview and More features pages, and the Create expense Scan and Manual tabs. No LogBox or red-box errors appeared, and logcat showed no JS console errors from the app.

Step	Status
App loads to Home with no visible JS errors The Home screen loaded normally, with the Concierge prompt box and nav bar. No error banners or red-box overlays appeared.	✅
Inbox opens and renders the chat list without errors The Inbox tab showed the Concierge welcome chat. No error text or dialogs appeared.	✅
Workspaces list and new-workspace creation work without errors The Workspaces tab showed the empty state. New workspace created "Tester Tester's Workspace", and Confirm opened the workspace settings page.	✅
Workspace Overview and More features pages open without errors The left nav listed Overview, Members, Rooms, Reports, MCP, Categories, Workflows, Company cards, and More features. More features showed every toggle (Categories, Tags, MCP, Receipt partners, HR, Accounting).	✅
Create expense flow (Scan and Manual tabs) opens without errors Create expense opened the Scan tab with its camera, gallery, and shutter buttons. The Manual tab showed the full expense form, including Amount, Merchant, Category, Date, Report, and the Create expense button.	✅
No JS console errors in logcat during navigation Logcat had 0 FATAL EXCEPTION entries and 0 ReactNativeJS console.error entries. The only error-level lines were React Native Fabric SurfaceMountingManager SoftException messages from the framework, not from JS or PolicyUtils. One harmless "ActivityIndicator has been shown for longer than expected" warning appeared on the Manual expense route.	✅

view run · view recording

MelvinBot · 2026-10-06T05:21:43Z

🤖 Web test steps verification results: ✅ pass

Inbox, Workspaces, the workspace Overview, More features, and Categories pages, and the Create expense flow all loaded correctly on dev NewDot web. No API call failed and no error appeared on screen. The browser tool can't capture the JS console on web, so this check used the screens and network traffic instead of a console log.

Step	Status
No errors appear in the JS console while loading the app and navigating Inbox, Workspaces, workspace settings/More features, and Create expense Every screen showed its expected content, with no error banners, blank screens, or crashes. Inbox showed Concierge messages and onboarding tasks. Workspaces listed the default workspace. Overview, More features (toggles), and Categories (default list) all rendered. Create expense opened with working Manual and Scan tabs, and the Merchant field accepted "Starbucks". The network log showed no failed responses for any API call, including OpenHomePage, OpenPolicyProfilePage, OpenPolicyCategoriesPage, OpenPolicyMoreFeaturesPage, OpenPolicyAccountingPage, and OpenReport. The browser tool has no console-log capture on web, so no literal console read was possible.	✅

view run · view recording

nkdengineer · 2026-10-06T07:37:57Z

@MelvinBot

Rename the file to vendor.ts
Update PolicyUtilsTest.ts to wrap all related functions in vendor.ts to a describe

…one describe Co-authored-by: nkdengineer <[email protected]>

MelvinBot · 2026-10-06T07:49:58Z

I pushed both changes in 0f2c4a8:

Renamed vendors.ts to src/libs/PolicyUtils/vendor.ts. index.ts now re-exports it with export * from './vendor'.
In PolicyUtilsTest.ts, every test for a vendor.ts function is now under describe('vendor'), like the existing describe('tag') block. This replaces the old "Vendor matching helpers" block.
- I moved the sortVendors tests into the block.
- I moved the getXeroExpenseAccounts tests out to the top level, because that function stays in index.ts.

All 586 tests in PolicyUtilsTest.ts pass. Typecheck, ESLint, and oxfmt also pass. I updated the PR title and description to match the new file name.

nkdengineer · 2026-10-06T08:11:11Z

@MelvinBot, fill out the Test section

Precondition: vendorMatching beta is enabled

Go to a WS
Enable Accounting
Connect to Campire
Verify that Vendors appears in the workspace menu item
Open the Vendors page
Verify that the vendor list is displayed the same as in Production
Go Accounting > Export > Default vendor for all company cards
Verify that the list of active vendors is displayed

Then update Offline tests and QA Steps to Same as test text

MelvinBot · 2026-10-06T08:15:27Z

I updated the PR description:

Tests: added the vendorMatching beta precondition and your 8 steps. I kept the "Verify that no errors appear in the JS console" checkbox.
Offline tests and QA Steps: both now say "Same as test".

I changed "Campire" to "Campfire" in step 3. The rest of your wording is unchanged.

view run

nkdengineer · 2026-10-06T08:17:44Z

@MelvinBot, fill the Screenshots/Videos

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.13.52.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.14.35.mov

iOS: Native

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.14.59.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.13.25.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.11.20.mov

MelvinBot · 2026-10-06T08:23:39Z

I filled the Screenshots/Videos section of the PR description with your five videos, one under each platform: Android: Native, Android: mWeb Chrome, iOS: Native, iOS: mWeb Safari, and MacOS: Chrome / Safari. The rest of the description is unchanged.

view run

nkdengineer · 2026-10-06T08:44:59Z

@MelvinBot, Update the Author Checklist section. Also, I verified there's no console error; then let's check for Verify that no errors appear in the JS console.. After that mark the PR as ready.

PR Author Checklist

I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
- I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
- I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
- I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
- I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
- The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
- The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If the PR adds or modifies the UI:
- I asked an AI agent to review the changes for accessibility issues and addressed its findings.
- I tested with a screen reader (VoiceOver on macOS) and verified all new/changed elements are reachable with a logical focus order.
- I verified all new/changed elements have meaningful accessible names and roles.
- I verified state changes are announced (e.g. checked/unchecked, expanded/collapsed, selected).
I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

MelvinBot · 2026-10-06T08:51:21Z

I updated the PR description, but I couldn't mark the PR as ready for review. This run doesn't allow me to change the PR's draft status.

Changes to the description:

I replaced the PR Author Checklist with the version you sent. Every item is now checked.
I checked "Verify that no errors appear in the JS console" in the Tests section.

The description now has 44 checked boxes and no unchecked ones. The PR is still a draft. Please click Ready for review on the PR yourself.

view run

nkdengineer · 2026-10-06T08:54:24Z

@MelvinBot Mark the PR as ready.

MelvinBot · 2026-10-06T08:57:44Z

I couldn't mark this PR as ready for review. The gh pr ready command isn't permitted in my environment, so the PR is still a draft.

To mark it ready yourself, click Ready for review at the bottom of the PR's Conversation tab.

view run

melvin-bot · 2026-10-06T15:48:54Z

@nkdengineer Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-10-06T15:49:01Z

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-06T16:01:59.815547Z	`0f2c4a8`	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

nkdengineer · 2026-10-06T15:50:36Z

@MelvinBot Resolve conflict.

…lsVendors Co-authored-by: nkdengineer <[email protected]> # Conflicts: # src/libs/PolicyUtils/index.ts

melvin-bot · 2026-10-06T16:03:29Z

@blimpich Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

MelvinBot · 2026-10-06T16:03:55Z

I merged main into this branch and resolved the conflict. The PR is mergeable again.

The conflict came from [CP Staging] Revert "Add Vendor filter to expense Search". That revert changed vendor code that this PR moves out of index.ts. I kept the move and applied the revert to vendor.ts:

Removed getVendorFeaturePolicyIDs and its export.
Restored main's comment on hasVendorFeatureOnAnyPolicy.

Nothing else references getVendorFeaturePolicyIDs. Typecheck, lint-changed, and PolicyUtilsTest (589 tests) pass.

The PR description still mentions getVendorFeaturePolicyIDs and 23 exported names. The correct count is now 22.

JmillsExpensify

No product review required.

nkdengineer · 2026-10-06T16:10:46Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: HybridApp
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: HybridApp
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If the PR adds or modifies the UI:
- I asked an AI agent to review the changes for accessibility issues and addressed its findings.
- I tested with a screen reader (VoiceOver on macOS) and verified all new/changed elements are reachable with a logical focus order.
- I verified all new/changed elements have meaningful accessible names and roles.
- I verified state changes are announced (e.g. checked/unchecked, expanded/collapsed, selected).
For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.13.52.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.14.35.mov

iOS: HybridApp

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.14.59.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.13.25.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2026-10-06.at.15.11.20.mov

nkdengineer

LGTM!

nkdengineer · 2026-10-06T16:12:58Z

@blimpich All yours.

OSBotify · 2026-10-06T16:18:03Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

github-actions · 2026-10-06T16:45:28Z

🚧 blimpich has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

github-actions · 2026-10-06T16:49:56Z

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #103135.

Android 🤖	iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-android-Adhoc-2bb4691-a2ff1d8-b8117e7490d999fc9c91c851611926f87093915d/index.html	https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-ios-device-AdHoc-2bb4691-a2ff1d8-035fd209251e32f4f65f533cd74f0c37c780ef4b/index.html

Web 🕸️
https://103135.pr-testing.expensify.com

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

OSBotify · 2026-10-06T22:29:29Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/blimpich in version: 9.5.4-0 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

MelvinBot · 2026-10-06T22:36:24Z

No help site update is needed. This PR is a pure refactor: it moves the vendor-matching helpers from PolicyUtils/index.ts into PolicyUtils/vendor.ts, with no user-facing behavior change.

view run

OSBotify · 2026-10-07T19:40:35Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 9.5.4-3 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

Android
iOS

Move PolicyUtils vendor-matching helpers into PolicyUtils/vendors.ts

0ac5be3

Co-authored-by: nkdengineer <[email protected]>

MelvinBot assigned nkdengineer Oct 6, 2026

MelvinBot requested a review from a team October 6, 2026 05:07

melvin-bot Bot added Melvin-Test-Android Melvin-Test-Web Triggers Melvin to run the testing steps of the PR on web labels Oct 6, 2026

MelvinBot mentioned this pull request Oct 6, 2026

[Due for payment 2026-10-28] [$500] [Refactor] Refactor PolicyUtils.ts to stay under the 4000-line ESLint limit #102675

Closed

Rename PolicyUtils/vendors.ts to vendor.ts and group its tests under …

0f2c4a8

…one describe Co-authored-by: nkdengineer <[email protected]>

MelvinBot changed the title ~~[Refactor] Move PolicyUtils vendor-matching helpers into vendors.ts~~ [Refactor] Move PolicyUtils vendor-matching helpers into vendor.ts Oct 6, 2026

blimpich marked this pull request as ready for review October 6, 2026 15:48

blimpich requested a review from a team as a code owner October 6, 2026 15:48

melvin-bot Bot requested review from nkdengineer and removed request for a team October 6, 2026 15:48

melvin-bot Bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and removed request for a team October 6, 2026 15:48

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into claude-splitPolicyUti…

4d3cb02

…lsVendors Co-authored-by: nkdengineer <[email protected]> # Conflicts: # src/libs/PolicyUtils/index.ts

MelvinBot requested a review from a team as a code owner October 6, 2026 16:03

melvin-bot Bot requested review from blimpich and removed request for a team October 6, 2026 16:03

JmillsExpensify reviewed Oct 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

nkdengineer approved these changes Oct 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

blimpich approved these changes Oct 6, 2026

View reviewed changes

blimpich merged commit 2bb4691 into main Oct 6, 2026
43 of 47 checks passed

blimpich deleted the claude-splitPolicyUtilsVendors branch October 6, 2026 16:14

OSBotify mentioned this pull request Oct 6, 2026

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2026-10-06 #103248

Closed

100 tasks done

Conversation

MelvinBot commented Oct 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

MelvinBot commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Oct 6, 2026 • edited by github-actions Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

MelvinBot commented Oct 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

MelvinBot commented Oct 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

nkdengineer commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

MelvinBot commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

nkdengineer commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

MelvinBot commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

nkdengineer commented Oct 6, 2026

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

MelvinBot commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

nkdengineer commented Oct 6, 2026

PR Author Checklist

Uh oh!

MelvinBot commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

nkdengineer commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

MelvinBot commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

melvin-bot Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 6, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codex Review Summary

Uh oh!

nkdengineer commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

melvin-bot Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

MelvinBot commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

JmillsExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

nkdengineer commented Oct 6, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

nkdengineer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

nkdengineer commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

MelvinBot commented Oct 6, 2026

Uh oh!

MelvinBot commented Oct 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Oct 6, 2026 •

edited by github-actions Bot

Loading

MelvinBot commented Oct 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

MelvinBot commented Oct 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 6, 2026 •

edited

Loading